2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02291-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial invariance of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire across gender in Chinese college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the practice phase, participants were shown pairs of faces that were a mix of happy and neutral, or angry and neutral expressions. Chinese Facial Affective Picture System (CFAPS) provided the source for all of the emotional pictures in this study (Wang & Luo, 2005). Other facial expressions not associated with the experiment were also included and randomly appeared.…”
Section: Laboratory Tasks and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the practice phase, participants were shown pairs of faces that were a mix of happy and neutral, or angry and neutral expressions. Chinese Facial Affective Picture System (CFAPS) provided the source for all of the emotional pictures in this study (Wang & Luo, 2005). Other facial expressions not associated with the experiment were also included and randomly appeared.…”
Section: Laboratory Tasks and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies focused on the original 36 item version, overall results support acceptable to adequate internal consistency on all scales in all versions (Chamizo-Nieto et al, 2020;Domínguez-Sánchez et al, 2013;Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006a;Jermann et al, 2006;Medrano et al, 2013;Megreya et al, 2016;Perţe & Miclea, 2011;Tuna & Bozo, 2012;Wang et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2008). However, in terms of structure, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) studies present mixed results with some studies favouring the original nine-factor structure (Betegón et al, 2022;Chamizo-Nieto et al, 2020;Megreya et al, 2016;Santos et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2008), while others suggesting a second-order structure where the nine dimensions are grouped into two more general factors, referred to as adaptive strategies and less adaptive strategies (Domínguez-Sánchez et al, 2013;Jermann et al, 2006;Xu et al, 2021). Also, some of the studies point to certain items with lower factor loadings than recommended (Holgado-Tello et al, 2018;Medrano et al, 2013;Tuna & Bozo, 2012;Wang et al, 2021), indicating the need for further evidence on the structure of the instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of structure, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) studies present mixed results with some studies favouring the original nine-factor structure (Betegón et al, 2022;Chamizo-Nieto et al, 2020;Megreya et al, 2016;Santos et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2008), while others suggesting a second-order structure where the nine dimensions are grouped into two more general factors, referred to as adaptive strategies and less adaptive strategies (Domínguez-Sánchez et al, 2013;Jermann et al, 2006;Xu et al, 2021). Also, some of the studies point to certain items with lower factor loadings than recommended (Holgado-Tello et al, 2018;Medrano et al, 2013;Tuna & Bozo, 2012;Wang et al, 2021), indicating the need for further evidence on the structure of the instrument. Of all these studies, only three compare different versions of the CERQ on the same sample of adults (Betegón et al, 2022;Holgado-Tello et al, 2018;Ireland et al, 2017), indicating better fit on shortened versions compared to the original one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations