2017
DOI: 10.1108/tqm-02-2017-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial structure for Six Sigma project barriers in Indian manufacturing and service industries

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the latent constructs of various barriers affecting Six Sigma implementation in Indian industries. Design/methodology/approach Literature review resulted in 15 frequently reported barriers in Six Sigma implementation. An empirical survey of 168 Six Sigma practitioners including green belts, black belts (BB), and master BB from 40 Indian companies was conducted with the help of a structured questionnaire. The responses were analyzed using exploratory factor ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, LSS implementation in Indian MSME depends heavily on vital CSFs such as "Involvement of Employees", "Top Management Commitment and Involvement", "VOCs", "Leadership", "Project Selection and Prioritization", "Cultural Transformations", "Understanding of LSS approach", "Strategic Planning", "Process Management", "Product Design Strategy", "Linking LSS to customer" and "Linking LSS to business goals" (Lande et al, 2016Yadav and Desai, 2017). It is critical to tackle the barriers to LSS implementation in Indian MSME to initiate cultural change in the organization (Ambekar and Hudnurkar, 2017;Singh et al, 2019). Besides, the need of the hour is to study the MSME' readiness and competitiveness for change and to gain more insights on LSS enablers (Douglas et al, 2017).…”
Section: Lean Six Sigma For Msmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, LSS implementation in Indian MSME depends heavily on vital CSFs such as "Involvement of Employees", "Top Management Commitment and Involvement", "VOCs", "Leadership", "Project Selection and Prioritization", "Cultural Transformations", "Understanding of LSS approach", "Strategic Planning", "Process Management", "Product Design Strategy", "Linking LSS to customer" and "Linking LSS to business goals" (Lande et al, 2016Yadav and Desai, 2017). It is critical to tackle the barriers to LSS implementation in Indian MSME to initiate cultural change in the organization (Ambekar and Hudnurkar, 2017;Singh et al, 2019). Besides, the need of the hour is to study the MSME' readiness and competitiveness for change and to gain more insights on LSS enablers (Douglas et al, 2017).…”
Section: Lean Six Sigma For Msmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An established method like TQM also finds "resistance to change" and "lack of resources" as major obstacles in its successful implementation (Bhat and Rajashekhar, 2009). Owing to ambidextrous nature of Six Sigma organisations (Schroeder et al, 2008), major barriers regarding organisational resources are financial and time constraints (Albliwi et al, 2014;Marzagão and Carvalho, 2016;Ambekar and Hudnurkar, 2017). As Six Sigma transformation takes place at operational as well as strategic levels, it warrants both operational resources and organisational change (McAdam and Hazlett, 2010).…”
Section: Six Sigma Project Capability Deficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items for various constructs were adopted from existing literature. A questionnaire was developed using barriers to Six Sigma implementation (Ambekar and Hudnurkar, 2017) to define Six Sigma project capability deficiency. The ratings (1-5) indicated the degree to which barriers affected the success of Six Sigma projects.…”
Section: Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are very much useful for manufacturing firms in controlling and eliminating quality-related problems which occur during different phases of production. Identifying the possible causes for the problem/defect can be done by using a tool called cause and effect diagram (Meybodi, 2005;Ambekar and Hudnurkar, 2017). Similarly, a bar chart showing the various factors for a problem/defect can be known using the Pareto analysis has their own function in improving the quality (Mandal et al, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Basic Quality Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%