2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-006-0027-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorial Structure of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) in Japan: A Study of Cultural, Developmental, and Gender Influences

Abstract: This study explored the factorial structure of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) in the Japanese population. Several differences between the structure model in the current study and Parker et al.'s original model were identified. We also examined the adaptability of the inventory to children currently being raised by parents. We also developed a structural equation model that takes into account the impacts of the respondents' generation and gender and the caregivers' gender. The cultural, developmental, ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
1
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
82
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard format is to ask respondents to rate how well each statement describes their mother "as you remember your mother in your first 16 years"; ratings are made on a 4-point scale (1 = very like; 2 = moderately like; 3 = moderately unlike; 4 = very unlike; the scale was reverse scored so that higher numbers reflect greater maternal care recollections). Although the PBI has been shown to have good reliability and validity (16), there is evidence that responders have difficulty interpreting and responding to the negatively framed "indifference" items, likely because of the double-negative involved (34); moreover, factor analyses indicate that the indifference items lack specificity (35). For these reasons, we included only the positively framed PBI care items in our maternal care composite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard format is to ask respondents to rate how well each statement describes their mother "as you remember your mother in your first 16 years"; ratings are made on a 4-point scale (1 = very like; 2 = moderately like; 3 = moderately unlike; 4 = very unlike; the scale was reverse scored so that higher numbers reflect greater maternal care recollections). Although the PBI has been shown to have good reliability and validity (16), there is evidence that responders have difficulty interpreting and responding to the negatively framed "indifference" items, likely because of the double-negative involved (34); moreover, factor analyses indicate that the indifference items lack specificity (35). For these reasons, we included only the positively framed PBI care items in our maternal care composite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japanese version of this scale was used [36]. The factor structure of the PBI among a Japanese population is virtually the same as that originally reported [37].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Uji, Tanaka, Shono, and Kitamura (2006) found a four factor solution (care, indifference, overprotection and encouragement of autonomy) to be psychometrically superior to a three factor solution in a Japanese study, for both adult and child generations.…”
Section: Parenting Behaviors and Childhood Anxietymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The first objective of this first study was to test the dimensionality of the instrument. Based on the result of Uji et al (2006), it was hypothesized that the four dimensions (care, indifference, overprotection and encouragement of autonomy) underlie the PBI, and this was tested for different generations and across countries. The second objective was to examine the association between perceived parenting behaviors and clinical symptoms in children.…”
Section: Overview Of Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%