2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2015)155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorisation and holomorphic blocks in 4d

Abstract: We study N = 1 theories on Hermitian manifolds of the form M 4 = S 1 × M 3 with M 3 a U(1) fibration over S 2 , and their 3d N = 2 reductions. These manifolds admit an Heegaard-like decomposition in solid tori D 2 × T 2 and D 2 × S 1 . We prove that when the 4d and 3d anomalies are cancelled, the matrix integrands in the Coulomb branch partition functions can be factorised in terms of 1-loop factors on D 2 × T 2 and D 2 × S 1 respectively. By evaluating the Coulomb branch matrix integrals we show that the 4d a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
170
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(205 reference statements)
9
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In higher-dimensional examples, also (point-like) instanton configurations will appear as zeros of the canonically chosen deformation term. 4 These results are closely related to the factorization results initiated in [45], and extended and generalized in [46][47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)183mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In higher-dimensional examples, also (point-like) instanton configurations will appear as zeros of the canonically chosen deformation term. 4 These results are closely related to the factorization results initiated in [45], and extended and generalized in [46][47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Jhep10(2015)183mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, the "high temperature" limit for indices, β → 0, or equivalently ω 2 → ∞, or p → 1 and q → 1, is well known. As noticed first in [24], in this case the indices reduce to partition functions of three-dimensional field theories up to a diverging exponential, which was shown in [40] to be related to anomaly coefficients in the combination a − c. The results of [21] were applied also in the context of formal holomorphic block factorisations of 4d superconformal indices [41] with the corresponding β → 0 3d-reduction. A more detailed consideration of this limit for several different theories was given in [42].…”
Section: Jhep07(2017)041mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…One can say that the original cocycle phase function emerging from the SL(3, Z) transformation represents some kind of a modified Casimir energy whose low temperature β → ∞ leading term yields the true Casimir energy. According to the considerations of [41], one can interpret the expression (2.5) as a combination of two superconformal indices defined on two different manifolds arising from a Heegarddecomposition of the original manifold. Then it remains to clarify the meaning of the result of such a gluing given by the expression (2.6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 See also [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] for related work on how the superconformal index or partition function of 4d N = 1 theories encodes various anomalies. 2 See [16] for a pedagogical exposition on anomalies and the anomaly polynomial.…”
Section: 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%