2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00378-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization breaking in diffractive dijet production

Abstract: We study diffractive hard dijet production, with one or two rapidity gaps, at high energies. We emphasize that both hard and Regge factorization are broken in these processes. We show that a multi-Pomeron-exchange model for screening effects gives a specific pattern for the breakdown of factorization, which is in good agreement with diffractive dijet data collected at the Tevatron.Comment: 6 pages, 1 figur

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The screening corrections are accounted for by the introduction of a suppression factor, which is often called the survival probability of rapidity gaps. As shown in [19] and [20], the current CDF diffractive dijet data, with one or two rapidity gaps, are in good quantitative agreement with the multi-Pomeronexchange model.…”
Section: Qcd Factorization Testssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The screening corrections are accounted for by the introduction of a suppression factor, which is often called the survival probability of rapidity gaps. As shown in [19] and [20], the current CDF diffractive dijet data, with one or two rapidity gaps, are in good quantitative agreement with the multi-Pomeronexchange model.…”
Section: Qcd Factorization Testssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A strong breakdown of factorization at the TEVATRON has been known for some time from run-I (1992-1995) results [28]: the single-diffractive to nondiffractive ratios for dijets, W , b-quark and J/ψ production, as well as the ratio of double-diffractive to non-diffractive dijet production are all ∼ 1%, a factor 10 less than at HERA. However, the ratio of double-to single-diffractive dijets is found to be about a factor 5 larger than the ratio of single-to non-diffractive dijets, suggesting that there is only a small extra suppression when going from one to two rapidity gaps in the event, as confirmed by predictions [20]. In this respect the TEVATRON data are being a very powerful tool to shed light on the factorization breaking mechanism.…”
Section: Diffraction At the Tevatronmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This "factorisation breaking" may be explained e.g. by soft interactions or multi-pomeron exchanges between the hadrons and/or rescattering phenomena which destroy the diffractive event signature [14][15][16].…”
Section: Jhep05(2015)056mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimate of S 2 excl for nuclear collisions was calculated in [21] using the Glauber model. Another conservative estimate can be obtained assuming that [22]: S 2 excl A 1 A 2 = S 2 excl pp /(A 1 · A 2 ) (For a discussion about nuclear diffraction see [23]). In what follows we will consider the latter model for S 2 excl A 1 A 2 when considering the central exclusive Z boson pair production.…”
Section: The Z Boson Pair Production In Diffractive Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%