2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11854-009-0001-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization of singular integral operators with a Carleman backward shift: The case of bounded measurable coefficients

Abstract: In this paper, we generalize our recent results concerning scalar singular integral operators with a Carleman backward shift, allowing more general coefficients, bounded measurable functions on the unit circle. Our aim is to obtain an operator factorization for singular integral operators with a backward shift and bounded measurable coefficients, from which such Fredholm characteristics as the kernel and the cokernel can be described. The main tool is the factorization of matrix functions. In the course of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These operators are similar to the classical Toeplitz plus Hankel operator (2) but the flip operator J of (3) is replaced by another operator J α generated by a linear fractional shift α changing the orientation of the circle T. Areas of particular interest to us are the kernels and cokernels of such operators and we are going to derive an explicit description of these spaces in the case where the generating functions a and b belong to the space L ∞ and satisfy an additional algebraic relation. Note that generalized Toeplitz plus Hankel operators have been previously considered in [10,11] but under more restrictive assumptions. Moreover, in the present work we single out certain classes of generalized Toeplitz plus Hankel operators which are subject to Coburn-Simonenko theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These operators are similar to the classical Toeplitz plus Hankel operator (2) but the flip operator J of (3) is replaced by another operator J α generated by a linear fractional shift α changing the orientation of the circle T. Areas of particular interest to us are the kernels and cokernels of such operators and we are going to derive an explicit description of these spaces in the case where the generating functions a and b belong to the space L ∞ and satisfy an additional algebraic relation. Note that generalized Toeplitz plus Hankel operators have been previously considered in [10,11] but under more restrictive assumptions. Moreover, in the present work we single out certain classes of generalized Toeplitz plus Hankel operators which are subject to Coburn-Simonenko theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in the last relations, the mapping α is understood as acting on the unit circle T. A proof of this result can be given by using relations (10). We omit the details here but mention that they can be found in the proof of Proposition 2.2 of [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be mentioned that the concept of antisymmetric factorization appeared quite recently in works devoted to Toeplitz plus Hankel operators (see, for instance, [2] and [1]) and separately (and independently), however without that name, in the theory of singular integral operators with a linear fractional shift developed by the authors of the present paper (see [5][6][7][8]). We observe that the factorization of matrix functions fulfilling especial conditions arise quite naturally when we look for the factorization of singular integral operators (or Toeplitz operators) being overweight, so to speak, with operators of the type of the operator U introduced above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It suffices to say, for instance, that the formula for the calculation of the dimension of the kernel of this kind of operators depends not only on the partial indices of the factorization of the corresponding matrix function (as is the case of a SIOC), but also on other characteristics of that factorization (see [5][6][7][8]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%