2010
DOI: 10.4213/tvp4286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factorization property of generalized $s$-selfdecomposable measures and class $L^F$ distributions

Abstract: Abstract. The method of random integral representation, that is, the method of representing a given probability measure as the probability distribution of some random integral, was quite successful in the past few decades. In this note we will find such a representation for generalized s-selfdecomposable and selfdecomposable distributions that have the factorization property. These are the classes U f β and L f , respectivelyMathematics Subject Classifications(2000): Primary 60F05 , 60E07, 60B11; Secondary 60H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and hence from [14], Lemma 1, which can be verified directly by taking derivatives with respect to ω of…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…and hence from [14], Lemma 1, which can be verified directly by taking derivatives with respect to ω of…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…where < •, • > denotes the scalar product and the triple: a vector z ∈ (5) and the corresponding random integral mapping…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Term: random integral emphasizes that h in ( 5) is a deterministic function ( not a stochastic process).] (b) Integrals over intervals (a,b) or (a,∞) or [a,b] and others are defined as weak limits of integrals over intervals (a,b] in (5). Thus, the random integral (a,∞) h(t)dY ν (r(t)) is well-defined if and only if the function…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) cf. Jurek (1985), Theorem 4.5 , Corollary 4.6 andIksanov, Jurek andSchreiber (2004), Theorem 1, Proposition 3; more on the class L f is in Czyżewska and Jurek (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%