2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation — A case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, CEM can better solve the problem of comparing profit and loss between the multiple attributes of ecosystem services, and it can reveal public preferences for each eco-functional attribute of ecosystem services [34]. Thus, CEM has been widely used for non-market valuation, including species conservation [35][36][37][38][39], wetland recovery [40][41][42][43][44], ecotourism preferences [45][46][47][48][49][50], tourists' preferences for land, the environmental functions of national parks [21,[39][40][41]51,52], and the exploration of methods for altering specific ecosystem services to affect economic benefits [34,[53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CEM can better solve the problem of comparing profit and loss between the multiple attributes of ecosystem services, and it can reveal public preferences for each eco-functional attribute of ecosystem services [34]. Thus, CEM has been widely used for non-market valuation, including species conservation [35][36][37][38][39], wetland recovery [40][41][42][43][44], ecotourism preferences [45][46][47][48][49][50], tourists' preferences for land, the environmental functions of national parks [21,[39][40][41]51,52], and the exploration of methods for altering specific ecosystem services to affect economic benefits [34,[53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of studies on the adoption of agricultural "best management practices" in the United States identified financial capacity as one of the key factors for program adoption [30]. This idea was further supported by a recent study in Sweden that showed that cost was the main factor preventing farmers in participating in a wetland creation program [31]. In view of this, it was expected that greater economic factors would lead to higher ICUA.…”
Section: Economic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As the participation in AEMs (and in other measures of the second pillar) is voluntary for farmers, it is crucial to understand what factors encourage their uptake. This aspect has been explored by Defrancesco et al [10], Bertoni et al [11], Burton [12], Franzén et al [13], and Pavlis et al [14], and compare farm, farmer, and territorial characteristics of all subjects that take part and do not take part toward AEMs. What commonly emerges from these studies is that younger farmers are more inclined towards sustainable farming practices.…”
Section: Evolving Agricultural and Agro-energy Policy Toward A Sustaimentioning
confidence: 99%