2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2004.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting fat droplet aggregation in whipped frozen protein-stabilized emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
27
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…D 4,3 parameter, obtained from droplet size distribution expressed as differential volume was used following an approach reported in the literature [12][13][14]. According to these authors, D 4,3 is more sensitive to fat droplet aggregation (coalescence and/or flocculation) than Sauter mean diameter (D 3,2 ).…”
Section: Particle Size Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D 4,3 parameter, obtained from droplet size distribution expressed as differential volume was used following an approach reported in the literature [12][13][14]. According to these authors, D 4,3 is more sensitive to fat droplet aggregation (coalescence and/or flocculation) than Sauter mean diameter (D 3,2 ).…”
Section: Particle Size Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For whipped cream and aerated emulsions, minimum 40% of solid fat content and b 0 -form crystals are commonly required to promote partial coalescence (Darling, 1982;Smith et al, 2000). However, the solid fat content in anhydrous milk fat is about 25.6% at 5 C. Different approaches have been examined to make up for the insufficient solid fat content of standard anhydrous milk fat ingredients for generating dairy creams with satisfactory whippability and stability (Relkin & Sourdet, 2005), for example, addition of milk proteins such as casein (Allen, Dickinson, & Murray, 2006) and whey proteins (Emam-Djome, Mousavi, Ghorbani, & Madadlou, 2008). Milk proteins are excellent emulsifiers and can prevent the oil droplets in whipping cream from re-coalescence during emulsification through their rapid adsorption at the oil-water interface to form viscoelastic interfacial membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emulsions showed a modal distribution of the particle size ( Figure 2) and great polydispersion, as observed in presence of SDS. D 4.3 is the most sensitive to droplet aggregation of all the measured mean diameters [17]. The emulsions prepared by HC ([protein] = 1 mg/mL) were the ones that showed the highest degree of flocculation of all the studied emulsion, particularly for DH 0, 1.8 y 2.5%, whereas those prepared with HpH under different assayed conditions did not show flocculation through bridge formation or flocculated only slightly (not more than 13%).…”
Section: Droplet Flocculation During Formationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The coalescence rate therefore increases as the droplet size of an emulsion increases, or when the droplets are pushed against each other. This process takes place in very concentrated emulsions and cream layers [17], [19]. In the case of DH 6%, larger droplets formed from the start (Table 1) which subsequently favored coalescence.…”
Section: Destabilization Kinetics Of the Cream Phasementioning
confidence: 99%