2017
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2017.1366323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting growth and body dimensions of pigs reared in alternative production

Abstract: The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of farrowing month (FM) and sex on growth performance (GP), measured in terms of body weight (BW) and dimensions such as the girth, length and the leg heights, of purebred Berkshire pigs reared in a hoop structure. Body weights were recorded at birth and every four weeks until 20th week for all traits. Backfat thickness (BF) was measured at the shoulder, in the middle and at the back with an ultrasound prior to slaughter. Least square means of GP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The body weight range (5.80 -7.39 kg) of the Nigerian indigenous piglets is also comparable to the 6.8 kg of low performing population, but less than the 12.2 kg of high performing population 6-week-old Hypor Libra' piglets in Netherlands (Paredes et al, 2014). The average body weight of the Nigerian indigenous piglets appeared lower than the 8.40 ± 2.04 kg found in purebred Berkshire pigs reared in a hoop structure (Park and Oh, 2018). The variation may be attributed to genotype and environmental factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The body weight range (5.80 -7.39 kg) of the Nigerian indigenous piglets is also comparable to the 6.8 kg of low performing population, but less than the 12.2 kg of high performing population 6-week-old Hypor Libra' piglets in Netherlands (Paredes et al, 2014). The average body weight of the Nigerian indigenous piglets appeared lower than the 8.40 ± 2.04 kg found in purebred Berkshire pigs reared in a hoop structure (Park and Oh, 2018). The variation may be attributed to genotype and environmental factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%