2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This “stiff gait pattern” may be due to the persistence of a learned “chronic osteoarthritis” gait pattern which does not resolve despite treatment of the affected hip joint. More specifically, reductions in the ROM could be due to residual muscle weakness, unrecovered soft tissue damage, or due to a physical barrier to further movement . As illustrated in Figure , the knees of individuals with a THR do not move fully into extension during mid to late stance, ultimately requiring additional muscular support, given their flexed position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This “stiff gait pattern” may be due to the persistence of a learned “chronic osteoarthritis” gait pattern which does not resolve despite treatment of the affected hip joint. More specifically, reductions in the ROM could be due to residual muscle weakness, unrecovered soft tissue damage, or due to a physical barrier to further movement . As illustrated in Figure , the knees of individuals with a THR do not move fully into extension during mid to late stance, ultimately requiring additional muscular support, given their flexed position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduction in stride length has been shown to be predominantly due to reduced hip sagittal plane range of motion [12,14], although Beaulieu also reported reduced peak hip extension [14]. Reductions in the hip range of motion and the corresponding reductions in stride length reported in the literature could be due to pain [26], muscle weakness [13,27], un-recovered soft tissue damage [13] or a physical barrier to further movement [28].…”
Section: Gait Parametersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…15 Whenever feasible, a bridge of bone/osteophyte 3 mm in size was left intentionally beyond the anterior edge of the component to prevent impingement of the psoas tendon. 16 The femoral component was placed in valgus orientation to the native neck-shaft angle. Resurfacing was performed only in the presence of intact bone at the head-neck junction to at least half the height of the profile cut for the implant of the intended size (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%