2004
DOI: 10.4141/a03-077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting intestinal starch digestion in ruminants: A review

Abstract: Harmon, D. L., Yamka, R. M. and Elam, N. A. 2004. Factors affecting intestinal starch digestion in ruminants: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 309-318. The process of starch assimilation in the ruminant is complex and remains an avenue by which increases in production efficiency can be gained. Ruminal starch digestion is typically 0.75-0.80 of starch intake. Starch that escapes fermentation and flows to the small intestine may be more resistant to enzymatic digestion and on average 0.35-0.60 of starch entering… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
63
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of post-ruminal starch digestion (on average 70%) occurs in small intestine, but starch digestibility in the intestine is extremely variable from 10% to 95%. Several studies have assessed factors that limit starch digestion in the small intestine (see reviews by Huntington, 1997;Harmon et al, 2004;Huntington et al, 2006). Briefly, ruminant pancreas seems more responsive to energy intake than to duodenal starch, and the brush border oligosaccharidase activities seem to be poorly responsive to diet.…”
Section: Starch Intestinal Digestion and Glucose Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of post-ruminal starch digestion (on average 70%) occurs in small intestine, but starch digestibility in the intestine is extremely variable from 10% to 95%. Several studies have assessed factors that limit starch digestion in the small intestine (see reviews by Huntington, 1997;Harmon et al, 2004;Huntington et al, 2006). Briefly, ruminant pancreas seems more responsive to energy intake than to duodenal starch, and the brush border oligosaccharidase activities seem to be poorly responsive to diet.…”
Section: Starch Intestinal Digestion and Glucose Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to barley, more starch from corn escapes from rumen fermentation, resulting in a higher intestinal starch flow (Offner et al, 2003). A limited amylolytic activity in the small intestine of dairy cows (Matthe et al, 2001), combined with a limited microbial fermentation of starch in the large intestine (Harmon et al, 2004), may attribute to the increased fecal excretion of corn starch. This assumption is supported by in situ data, whereby cows fed diets containing corn grain had higher fecal potential degradability in situ compared with barley grain alone (Table 4), indicating the presence of higher amounts of potentially degradable substrate, most probably undigested starch, in the feces of cows fed diets consisting of corn and barley grain than in those fed barley grain alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-E-mail: Martin.Weisbjerg@agrsci.dk not appear to be a quantitative limitation to intestinal starch digestion (Harmon et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%