2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting irrigation water savings in raised beds in rice and wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we observed no significant differences, whether direct-seeded or transplanted under fresh or permanent beds, compared to the conventionally tilled treatments with sowing under flat conditions. This result was also different from some studies in R-W systems on fresh or permanent beds (Bhushan et al, 2007;Choudhury et al, 2006;Gathala et al, 2011a,b;Kukal et al, 2010;Yadvinder-Singh et al, 2009). Each of these studies which were conducted in Northwest IGP reported lower rice yield under fresh or permanent beds compared to conventionally-tilled puddled condition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, we observed no significant differences, whether direct-seeded or transplanted under fresh or permanent beds, compared to the conventionally tilled treatments with sowing under flat conditions. This result was also different from some studies in R-W systems on fresh or permanent beds (Bhushan et al, 2007;Choudhury et al, 2006;Gathala et al, 2011a,b;Kukal et al, 2010;Yadvinder-Singh et al, 2009). Each of these studies which were conducted in Northwest IGP reported lower rice yield under fresh or permanent beds compared to conventionally-tilled puddled condition.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…However, if maize is grown under reduced or no tillage with residue retention -even in the case of permanent beds -then both SOM and SNS capacity can be maintained (Govaerts et al, 2006(Govaerts et al, , 2007Witt et al, 2000). This was perhaps the reason why the studies conducted in the Northwestern IGP (e.g., Kukal et al, 2010;Yadvinder-Singh et al, 2009) had no benefits to rice on permanent beds over the conventional tillage with flat planting, as none of those studies retained residue of different crops. Moreover, as mentioned above, Yadvinder- Singh et al (2009) and Kukal et al (2010) used larger tractor tire size width and hence may have compacted the beds formed on light soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Planting methods affect the plant population and nutrient availability (Ijaz et al, 2015). Most commonly used method for water conservation in crop plants are drill sowing (Aiken et al, 2015) raised bed planting (Kukal et al, 2010) and furrow planting . Seedling establishment is a phenological stage at which drought stress could be damaging to the plants (Croser et al, 2003).…”
Section: Management Strategies For Drought Tolerance In Rapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ZT takes advantage of residual moisture from the previous crop, water use is decreased by~10 cm¨ha´1 (~1 million L¨ha´1¨year´1). There was no yield advantage of growing crops on beds compared with flat areas under rice-wheat system on permanent beds, and there was little advantage in water savings [96][97][98].…”
Section: Conservation Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%