2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2266530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Abstract: The Speech Reception Threshold for sentences in stationary noise and in several amplitude-modulated noises was measured for 8 normal-hearing listeners, 29 sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners, and 16 normal-hearing listeners with simulated hearing loss. This approach makes it possible to determine whether the reduced benefit from masker modulations, as often observed for hearing-impaired listeners, is due to a loss of signal audibility, or due to suprathreshold deficits, such as reduced spectral and tempor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
190
7
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(48 reference statements)
20
190
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, experimental features that result in high SNR in the steady noise baseline condition are associated with relatively small masking release in the synchronous modulation condition. Such experimental features include listener group type, such as normal hearing vs hearing impairment (e.g., Wilson and Carhart, 1969;Festen and Plomp, 1990;Takahashi and Bacon, 1992;Eisenberg et al, 1995;Peters et al, 1998;George et al, 2006), or stimulus characteristics such as unfiltered or filtered speech presented to normal-hearing listeners (Oxenham and Simonson, 2009). This association between a high SRT in steady noise and low magnitude of masking release is not followed uniformly when comparing our previous results for a pink noise masker (Hall et al, 2014) to the current results for a speechshaped masker.…”
Section: B Masking Releasecontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…Typically, experimental features that result in high SNR in the steady noise baseline condition are associated with relatively small masking release in the synchronous modulation condition. Such experimental features include listener group type, such as normal hearing vs hearing impairment (e.g., Wilson and Carhart, 1969;Festen and Plomp, 1990;Takahashi and Bacon, 1992;Eisenberg et al, 1995;Peters et al, 1998;George et al, 2006), or stimulus characteristics such as unfiltered or filtered speech presented to normal-hearing listeners (Oxenham and Simonson, 2009). This association between a high SRT in steady noise and low magnitude of masking release is not followed uniformly when comparing our previous results for a pink noise masker (Hall et al, 2014) to the current results for a speechshaped masker.…”
Section: B Masking Releasecontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…This effect has been shown consistently for persons with normal hearing (Duquesnoy, 1983, George, Festen & Houtgast, 2006. However, individuals with hearing impairment do not always seem to benefit in the same way, possibly due to temporal and spectral smearing (Festen & Plomp, 1990;George et al, 2006;George et al, 2007;Lorenzi, Gilbert, Carn, Garnier & Moore, 2006;Wagener, Brand & Kollmeier, 2006). Alternatively, it has been proposed that benefit of listening in the dips of modulated noise decreases with increasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Noisementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The noise spectrum peaked at 400-500 Hz and rolled off by 13.4 dB at 2000 Hz. Fluctuating noise was squarewave modulated with 100 % depth and a modulation frequency of 16 Hz, as in a previous human study (George et al 2006). Gating functions and squarewave modulation, when used, were imposed on the noise waveforms after scaling the level.…”
Section: Behavioral Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural discrimination thresholds were estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (Egan 1975) of responses to formant frequencies spanning the 100-Hz range from 2000 to 2100 Hz and, for BF-matched stimuli, the 100-Hz range starting at the highest harmonic frequency below BF. ROC analysis computes the performance with which two stimuli can be classified based on a single observation of the response variable (average rate or synchronized rate), and hence provides a convenient framework for comparison to behavioral data.…”
Section: Formant Discrimination Thresholds Of Individual Recording Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%