2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting Nitrate Concentrations in Stream Base Flow

Abstract: Elevated nitrogen concentrations in streams and rivers in the Chesapeake Bay watershed have adversely affected the ecosystem health of the bay. Much of this nitrogen is derived as nitrate from groundwater that discharges to streams as base flow. In this study, boosted regression trees (BRTs) were used to relate nitrate concentrations in base flow (n = 156) to explanatory variables describing nitrogen sources, geology, and soil and catchment characteristics. From these relations, a BRT model was developed to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During spring precipitation events, water infiltrates rapidly through relatively bare soils, encountering accumulated nitrogen stocks in the shallow subsurface from previous years or early season fertilizer application, and is routed off the landscape through tile drains (Van Meter et al, 2020;Royer et al, 2006). High-flow periods can also reduce the ability of biological processes to alter NO − 3 concentrations (Rodríguez-Blanco et al, 2015;Royer et al, 2006;Wollheim et al, 2018). This seasonality of the NO − 3 concentration has been previously observed in the Raccoon River watershed (Schilling and Zhang, 2004) and other agricultural catchments in the Midwest (Dupas et al, 2017;Van Meter et al, 2020;Pellerin et al, 2014).…”
Section: During Stormflow Periods No −mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…During spring precipitation events, water infiltrates rapidly through relatively bare soils, encountering accumulated nitrogen stocks in the shallow subsurface from previous years or early season fertilizer application, and is routed off the landscape through tile drains (Van Meter et al, 2020;Royer et al, 2006). High-flow periods can also reduce the ability of biological processes to alter NO − 3 concentrations (Rodríguez-Blanco et al, 2015;Royer et al, 2006;Wollheim et al, 2018). This seasonality of the NO − 3 concentration has been previously observed in the Raccoon River watershed (Schilling and Zhang, 2004) and other agricultural catchments in the Midwest (Dupas et al, 2017;Van Meter et al, 2020;Pellerin et al, 2014).…”
Section: During Stormflow Periods No −mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Simultaneously, the difficulty of data acquisition must be considered [ 39 , 51 ]. For the simplicity and feasibility of the model, the input indicators must be at a sufficiently small scale to make estimations [ 52 ]. For the convenience of data acquisition, we only selected five water-quality parameters that can be measured easily in situ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that while temporal patterns in chloride concentrations in POBR were strong and signi cant, there were no signi cant trends in loads. Trends in concentrations are likely more indicative of internal watershed processes as most of our samples were taken under base ow conditions (Table 1) and therefore are less affected by hydrologic conditions than load estimates (Wherry et al 2021).…”
Section: Chloridementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there was no correlation between deposition and nitrate loads in either stream. As for chloride, analysis of base ow nitrate concentrations may be more useful for assessing the effects of environmental change on internal watershed processes than analysis of loads, which are dominated by hydrologic factors (Wherry et al 2021).…”
Section: Nitratementioning
confidence: 99%