2020
DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.283887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting outcomes of surgically treated patients with cranial extradural hematoma: A cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in the series of Das et al 12 55 patients (3%) expired, all of whom had time between injury and surgery of more than 12 hours. On contrary to our results, Lafta et al 17 reported that the time interval between injury and patient reception had no effect on mortality. This difference from our results can be attributed to: in their series, 46% of patients had the time interval between injury and reception of <3 hours and 38% of received patients presented with high GCS.…”
Section: Time To Surgery and Postoperative Hospital Coursecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in the series of Das et al 12 55 patients (3%) expired, all of whom had time between injury and surgery of more than 12 hours. On contrary to our results, Lafta et al 17 reported that the time interval between injury and patient reception had no effect on mortality. This difference from our results can be attributed to: in their series, 46% of patients had the time interval between injury and reception of <3 hours and 38% of received patients presented with high GCS.…”
Section: Time To Surgery and Postoperative Hospital Coursecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Bailly et al [28] showed that the risk of injury to cervical spines was higher in patients with TBI (4.5%) than in those with no head injury (1.1). In light of these recent reports (including our study) and in accordance with their experience with flexion-extension (F-E) studies, their use was limited to patients with highrisk, those with severe injury according to GCS score (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), those involved in trauma related to vehicles and those with severe associated injuries. Because the analysis of our data and the above studies suggested that patients with mild and moderate GCS score with non-vehicular-related trauma and no or less severe associated injuries have significantly low risk of having an unstable injury to cervical spine, we can limit the use of F-E studies in patients meeting these criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Focusing on GCS for all patients was at the top of priorities. The TBI was considered mild if GCS was 13-15) moderate if GCS was 9-12, while severe if GCS was 3-8 [3]. A checking for a probability of cervical injury was done by obtaining cervical spine x-ray and CT scan once the clinical decision was taken.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TBI is classified according to the clinical assessment of a patient’s conscious level [ 2 , 3 ]. The current classification system, based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), divides TBI into mild (GCS 14 to 15), moderate (GCS 9 to 13), and severe (GCS 3 to 8) [ 4 ]. In the severe type, mortality rate approaches 40%, with most deaths occurring in the first 48 hours after injury [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%