1993
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting outpatient treatment compliance of older male problem drinkers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Published studies of "older" patient groups have employed different age cutoffs ranging from 45 to 65 yr (Atkinson, 1995). The 55-yr age cutoff lies at the midpoint of this range, and is consistent with several other studies of alcohol and aging (Atkinson et al, 1993;Gomberg, 1995;Kofoed et al, 1987;Moos et al, 1994).…”
Section: Methods Subjectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Published studies of "older" patient groups have employed different age cutoffs ranging from 45 to 65 yr (Atkinson, 1995). The 55-yr age cutoff lies at the midpoint of this range, and is consistent with several other studies of alcohol and aging (Atkinson et al, 1993;Gomberg, 1995;Kofoed et al, 1987;Moos et al, 1994).…”
Section: Methods Subjectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Older persons with alcohol disorders were significantly more likely to complete treatment than younger patients (Schuckit 1977;Wiens et al, 1982-83). Atkinson et al (1993) also found that the proportion of older male alcoholics who completed treatment was twice that of younger men. Despite generally better compliance rates, two studies have shown that programming which addressed problems and concerns specific to older adults in treatment groups separate from younger adults (age-specific programming) improved treatment completion and resulted in higher rates of attendance at group meetings (Atkinson, 1995;Kofoed et al, 1987).…”
Section: Treatment Compliancementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Noting that the sample size limits statistical power, we drew from the conceptual framework upon which the original studies were designed (i.e., that individual, treatment and extra-treatment factors influence outcome). The specific variables selected have been associated in the literature with better outcome (female gender, greater age, longer length of stay in treatment, greater number of AA meetings attended in the 30 days prior to follow-up; Weisner et al, 2003) and treatment adherence (later initiation of heavy drinking; Atkinson et al, 1993). We included the number of days between baseline and followup interview as a control variable because length of time to follow-up differed between the two studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%