2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00035-016-0166-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting primary succession of glacier foreland vegetation in the European Alps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). To some degree, the trend line for species numbers displays a negative logarithmic behaviour, indicating a kind of saturation in species establishment during succession, most likely due to inter- and intraspecific competition 22,28,29 . Also, the trend line for ground cover shows this effect towards the older sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). To some degree, the trend line for species numbers displays a negative logarithmic behaviour, indicating a kind of saturation in species establishment during succession, most likely due to inter- and intraspecific competition 22,28,29 . Also, the trend line for ground cover shows this effect towards the older sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analyses applied standard uni- and multivariate statistical procedures. As primary succession in glacier forelands commonly starts with simple agglomerations of plants and subsequently becomes more and more complex 22,28,29,44 , a quantitative assessment of the vegetation development during succession after glacier retreat is achieved by recording changes in species numbers, ground cover (of singular species and in total) as well as lifeform composition at different temporal stages. Temporal trends of changing ground cover and species numbers are derived by non-linear regressions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding confirms the importance of other research that has emphasized the importance of soil moisture as a driver of vegetation succession after glacier recession (e.g., Burga et al, 2010;Caccianiga & Andreis, 2001;Miller & Lane, 2019;Rydgren et al, 2014). Soil moisture is likely to be of importance for other elements of vegetation succession such as microbial systems (Levy, Robinson, Krause, Waller, & Weatherill, 2015;Marteinsdóttir, Svavarsdóttir, & Thórhallsdóttir, 2010;Marteinsdóttir, Thórhallsdóttir, & Svavarsdóttir, 2013;Raffl et al, 2006;Robinson, Fairchild, & Russell, 2008;Rydgren et al, 2014;Schumann et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies argued that ecosystem development was a function of time since deglaciation, which was theorized via a space-for-time substitution (Matthews, 1992) as a chronosequence. Matthews (1992) proposed a more developed conceptual model where ecological succession was not simply interpreted as a function of time but also (a) abiotic processes such as soil grain size, microrelief, microclimate, hydrology, slope, and geomorphic stability (Burga et al, 2010;Garibotti, Pissolito, & Villalba, 2011;Rydgren, Halvorsen, Töpper, & Njos, 2014;Wietrzyk, Wegrzyn, & Lisowska, 2016) and (b) biotic processes including species interaction and competition (Schumann, Gewolf, & Tackenberg, 2016). Initially, the spatial heterogeneity in abiotic processes is thought to be dominant, but as the terrain becomes more stable and ecosystem succession advances, biotic factors are thought to become more influential (Matthews, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During succession in alpine glacier forelands, not only do cover and biomass change quickly but species composition does, too (Matthews and Whittaker 1987;Chapin et al 1994;Raffl and Erschbamer 2004;Raffl et al 2006;Matthews 2009, 2010;Burga et al 2010). Because of the site-specific differences in abiotic and biotic conditions, successional seres are known to be highly variable (Caccianiga and Andreis 2004;Schumann, Gewolf, and Tackenberg 2016). Nevertheless, patterns of vegetation dynamics show similarities in their main features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%