2018
DOI: 10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting selection of anesthesia type in elective cesarean operations and pregnant preferences for anesthesia outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we reported that only 35.8% of pregnant women were operated on under neuraxial anesthesia. 22 Compared to our previous report, this shows an increased tendency to use neuraxial techniques in pregnant women with COVID-19. In an earlier study, Chen et al 23 found the rate of hypotension to be 86% in pregnant women infected with COVID-19 who underwent regional anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we reported that only 35.8% of pregnant women were operated on under neuraxial anesthesia. 22 Compared to our previous report, this shows an increased tendency to use neuraxial techniques in pregnant women with COVID-19. In an earlier study, Chen et al 23 found the rate of hypotension to be 86% in pregnant women infected with COVID-19 who underwent regional anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In this study, 89.1% of the patients were operated on under spinal anesthesia. Before the COVID‐19 pandemic, we reported that only 35.8% of pregnant women were operated on under neuraxial anesthesia 22 . Compared to our previous report, this shows an increased tendency to use neuraxial techniques in pregnant women with COVID‐19.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…However, choice selection is known to be affected by patient characteristics including socioeconomic status and level of maternal education as well as the knowledge, experience and expertise of anaesthetists and obstetricians. [24] When recalculating the proportion of deliveries using labour epidurals after excluding the number of deliveries performed by CS (and excluding CS performed under epidural anaesthesia), the epidural frequency was 3.29% (n=3 560/108 231) for vaginal deliveries, 13.81% in private hospitals and 1.47% in public hospitals.…”
Section: Public Hospitals N=26mentioning
confidence: 99%