1983
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/38.3.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting starch digestibility and the glycemic response with special reference to legumes

Abstract: Large differences exist in the degree to which different starch containing foods affect the blood glucose levels of both normal volunteers and diabetics. These differences appear to relate to the digestibility of the starch and the factors determining this, including: the interaction of starch with fiber, antinutrients (eg, phytate) and protein in the food, together with the nature of the starch itself and its physical form (eg, raw or cooked, ground or whole). In this respect legumes exemplify a class of food… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
139
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, heterogeneous starch types from different sources are considered to have a strong impact on the rate and extent of in vivo glucose response , even if misleading results were reported (Thorne et al, 1983;Annison and Topping, 1994;Noah et al, 2000), probably because of the confounding effects of starch-associated compounds (such as fat, fibre, protein and/ or anti-enzymatic complexes; Parada and Aguilera, 2011) or because of experimental conditions (observation of the glucose response in peripheral circulation v. portal circulation or different coverage of in vivo postprandial duration) (Regmi et al, 2011). As a consequence, additional information is currently warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, heterogeneous starch types from different sources are considered to have a strong impact on the rate and extent of in vivo glucose response , even if misleading results were reported (Thorne et al, 1983;Annison and Topping, 1994;Noah et al, 2000), probably because of the confounding effects of starch-associated compounds (such as fat, fibre, protein and/ or anti-enzymatic complexes; Parada and Aguilera, 2011) or because of experimental conditions (observation of the glucose response in peripheral circulation v. portal circulation or different coverage of in vivo postprandial duration) (Regmi et al, 2011). As a consequence, additional information is currently warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the world's most important legume crops as it contains approximately 50% available carbohydrate, primarily in the form of starch, and is considered to be a good source of protein (Paul & Southgate, 1978;Thorne et al, 1983;Khan et al, 1995). The chickpea is a staple food in countries such as India and Pakistan (Chavan et al, 1986;Schneider, 2002), and also plays an important role in traditional cuisine and diet in other parts of the world, including in the Mediterranean region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors responsible for the observed differences between foods in the postprandial glucose response include type of starch (amylose vs amylopectin, Behall et al, 1989;Granfeldt et al, 1995; van Amelsvoort & Weststrate, 1992), amylose structure (type 2 vs type 3 RS; Vonk et al, 2000), amount and type of fiber (insoluble vs soluble; Glore et al, 1994;Wolever & Jenkins, 1993), antinutrient components (ie phytate, etc; Thorne et al, 1983), food form, and processing method (Björck et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%