“…For example, the ORR activity of the Pt surface follows the order of Pt(110)≃Pt(111) ≫ Pt(100), and the premises considering (111) surfaces as the highly active structure for Pt 3 Co and Pt 3 Ni have led to the development of nanooctahedra, , which exhibit eight facets with (111) atomic arrangement. ,, However, as for practical Pt-based catalysts, e.g., NPs or polyhedral nanostructures, the coexistence of multiple surface facets and the formed surface defects including steps, kinks, and even the secondary metal segregation will cause the ORR performance deviate from the ideally predicted cases, and some even showed enhancement of performance. , For example, the presence of (100) terraces on Pt(111) surfaces is revealed as the critical characteristic to boost the ORR kinetics. , The Pt–Ni nanostructures dominated by (100) surfaces were found to possess higher ORR activity than that of conventional NPs enclosed mostly by (111) and (100) facets . In light of these results, more conclusive descriptors in addition to the surface index (e.g., generalized coordination number) have to be developed to deal with the real-world catalysts, , while those dedicated and underlying parameters also suggest more room to regulate the morphology and surface structure of Pt–M catalysts for promising properties …”