2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-018-0876-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the determination of iron species in the presence of ferric iron

Abstract: The high concentration Fe 3+ in sample had interference on the determination of iron species by spectrophotometric method in which 1,10-phenanthroline was used to as a chromogenic agent. The F − could mask absolutely the effect of Fe 3+ when F − / Fe 3+ molar concentration ratio was 13.3. The temperature or light did not affect the masking action of F −. Low temperature and dark conditions favored the stability of chromophoric complex. This method is suitable for the measure of iron species where the concentra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the size range of the added ferrihydrite and organic-iron complexes formed in the rhizosphere, the chance of introducing colloidal iron in the collected pore water sample at 0.45 μm is high but is considered to be a dissolved iron phase . Collected pore water samples were analyzed in situ for reduced iron (Fe­(II)) by the 1,10-phenanthroline method spectrophotometrically (Vernier Spectrophotometer, USA) at 510 nm. A part of the sample was acidified with trace-certified hydrochloric acid for arsenic, uranium and total iron quantification in ICP-MS and major cations analysis in atomic absorption spectroscopy (PerkinElmer AAnalyst 400 Spectrophotometer). A part of the sample was acidified with sulfuric acid for colorimetric (Seal AQ2 Autoanalyzer) analyses of nitrate and ammonia.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the size range of the added ferrihydrite and organic-iron complexes formed in the rhizosphere, the chance of introducing colloidal iron in the collected pore water sample at 0.45 μm is high but is considered to be a dissolved iron phase . Collected pore water samples were analyzed in situ for reduced iron (Fe­(II)) by the 1,10-phenanthroline method spectrophotometrically (Vernier Spectrophotometer, USA) at 510 nm. A part of the sample was acidified with trace-certified hydrochloric acid for arsenic, uranium and total iron quantification in ICP-MS and major cations analysis in atomic absorption spectroscopy (PerkinElmer AAnalyst 400 Spectrophotometer). A part of the sample was acidified with sulfuric acid for colorimetric (Seal AQ2 Autoanalyzer) analyses of nitrate and ammonia.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interference could be eliminated by incorporating a masking agent, sodium fluoride (Zhu et al, 2018). The quenching of fluorescence due to addition of high concentration of other heavy metal ions could be due to the adsorption of the heavy metal ions on the surface of thiol‐coated QD (Ke et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Based on literature; the reaction between ferrous ion and phen is highly selective and sensitive to ferrous to form a reddish/orange complex 33 . The mechanism is based on the reduction of ferric to ferrous carried out by a reducing agent such as hydroxylamine, followed by metal complexion with phen which is considered as a selective ligand to iron metal through the implication of three nitrogen groups with iron (II) 34 .…”
Section: Results and Discussion: Methods A (Determination Of Iron Via Conventional Spectrophotometer Technique)mentioning
confidence: 99%