1983
DOI: 10.2307/2259735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting the Distribution of Tree Species in a Dry Zone Montane Forest in Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individuals of plant species falling precisely on the line were recorded. The data from each sampling site was calculated using phytosociological characters (i.e., density, frequency, cover and their relative values, as well as importance value) [46][47][48]. The IV was further used to rank each plant species and species with the highest IV were considered as the dominant species [46,47].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individuals of plant species falling precisely on the line were recorded. The data from each sampling site was calculated using phytosociological characters (i.e., density, frequency, cover and their relative values, as well as importance value) [46][47][48]. The IV was further used to rank each plant species and species with the highest IV were considered as the dominant species [46,47].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could happen if large trees had higher levels of mortality in small sholas because of greater vulnerability to high-speed winds prevailing during the southwesterly monsoon (Meher-Homji 1967;Vishnu-Mittre and Gupta 1968;Jayasuriya and Pemadasa 1983;Caner et al 2007). The closed, well-integrated canopy characteristic of the larger sholas might reduce wind turbulence and thereby protect shola trees from the ravages of severe wind (Lawton 1982;Leigh 1983Leigh , 1999.…”
Section: Dbh Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveyed sites were divided into 23 stands, and three sampling points within each stand were sampled along a 50 meter transect (total = 69 transects). The phytosociological attributes (i.e., density, frequency, cover and their relative values, and importance value) were used for the calculation of the data from each sampled point [42][43][44]. The IV was further used to rank each species, and those with the highest IV were considered as the dominant species [42,43].…”
Section: Vegetation Sampling and Plant Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%