Factors Affecting the Immunogenicity of Oral Poliovirus Vaccine in Developing Countries: Review

Patriarca, P.; Wright, Peter F.; John, T. Jacob

doi:10.1093/clinids/13.5.926

Cited by 417 publications

(270 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

255

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, our recent data demonstrate a critical role for intestinal microflora in promoting immunity to influenza vaccine immunity. This finding may be of particular relevance in developing countries, where the efficacy of oral vaccines against polio, rotavirus, and cholera have showed a lower immunogenicity relative to efficacy in developed countries (75)(76)(77)(78). In a study testing a live cholera oral vaccine, Lagos et al (79) demonstrated that excessive bacterial growth in the small intestine of children in less-developed countries might contribute to the low antibody response to the vaccine.…”

Section: Vaccines For Which There Are No Knownmentioning

confidence: 98%

Systems vaccinology: Probing humanity’s diverse immune systems with vaccines

Pulendran

2014

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

175

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Homo sapiens are genetically diverse, but dramatic demographic and socioeconomic changes during the past century have created further diversification with respect to age, nutritional status, and the incidence of associated chronic inflammatory disorders and chronic infections. These shifting demographics pose new challenges for vaccination, as emerging evidence suggests that age, the metabolic state, and chronic infections can exert major influences on the immune system. Thus, a key public health challenge is learning how to reprogram suboptimal immune systems to induce effective vaccine immunity. Recent advances have applied systems biological analysis to define molecular signatures induced early after vaccination that correlate with and predict the later adaptive immune responses in humans. Such "systems vaccinology" approaches offer an integrated picture of the molecular networks driving vaccine immunity, and are beginning to yield novel insights about the immune system. Here we discuss the promise of systems vaccinology in probing humanity's diverse immune systems, and in delineating the impact of genes, the environment, and the microbiome on protective immunity induced by vaccination. Such insights will be critical in reengineering suboptimal immune systems in immunocompromised populations.

show abstract

Section: Vaccines For Which There Are No Knownmentioning

confidence: 98%

Systems vaccinology: Probing humanity’s diverse immune systems with vaccines

Pulendran

2014

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

175

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Seroprevalence estimates at 18 and 20 months of age are interpreted here as seroconversion. OPV: Oral poliovirus vaccine; PV1: Type 1 poliovirus; PV2: Type 2 poliovirus; PV3: Type 3 poliovirus.vaccines [9][10][11] and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) (Figure 1) [12]. Limited efficacy of OPV has contributed to the persistence of poliovirus transmission in several countries, delaying global eradication.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Causes of Impaired Oral Vaccine Efficacy in Developing Countries

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral vaccines are less immunogenic when given to infants in low-income compared with high-income countries, limiting their potential public health impact. Here, we review factors that might contribute to this phenomenon, including transplacental antibodies, breastfeeding, histo blood group antigens, enteric pathogens, malnutrition, microbiota dysbiosis and environmental enteropathy. We highlight several clear risk factors for vaccine failure, such as the inhibitory effect of enteroviruses on oral poliovirus vaccine. We also highlight the ambiguous and at times contradictory nature of the available evidence, which undoubtedly reflects the complex and interconnected nature of the factors involved. Mechanisms responsible for diminished immunogenicity may be specific to each oral vaccine. Interventions aiming to improve vaccine performance may need to reflect the diversity of these mechanisms. Enteric pathogens are a substantial threat to public health. This threat takes many forms, from the toxin-producing bacteria (e.g., Vibrio cholerae) and flagellated protozoa (e.g., Giardia lamblia) that colonize the mucosal surface of the small intestine to the enteroviruses that are capable of spreading via the bloodstream to the CNS, causing acute flaccid paralysis (e.g., poliovirus). Each year, enteric pathogens cause hundreds of millions of cases of diarrhea and approximately 800,000 deaths, the vast majority of which occur among children in low-income countries [1]. The most common causes of childhood diarrheal morbidity include rotavirus, Cryptosporidium, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Shigella [2].Vaccines against enteric pathogens are important tools for mitigating this disease burden. Oral vaccines offer several distinct benefits compared with parenteral vaccines. They can be produced in large quantities at relatively low cost, are easy to administer and have the capacity to induce local immunity in the intestinal mucosa, thereby protecting vaccinated individuals against subsequent infection and -by blocking onward transmission -enhancing herd immunity [3,4]. Currently licensed oral vaccines include live-attenuated poliovirus vaccines containing one, two or three serotypes, live-attenuated rotavirus vaccines (Rotarix R , RotaTeq R , Lanzhou lamb rotavirus vaccine [China only] and Rotavac R [India only]), live-attenuated cholera vaccine (CVD 103-HgR or Vaxchora TM ), inactivated cholera vaccines (Dukoral R and Shanchol R ) and live-attenuated typhoid vaccine (Ty21a). Other oral vaccines are in development, including those against Shigella, enterotoxigenic E. coli, Campylobacter and Clostridium difficile, as well as several novel rotavirus vaccine candidates (including the human neonatal vaccine RV3-BB [5] and an oral bovine pentavalent vaccine [6]).Yet oral vaccines have an Achilles' heel -their immunogenicity and efficacy is impaired in low-income countries that experience the greatest burden of enteric disease (Box 1). For example, Rotarix has a 1-year protective efficacy against severe rotavirus-associated gas...

show abstract

“…61 A parallel experience with live attenuated polio vaccine, where type one and three viruses were poorly immunogenic in trivalent vaccine, was rectified by modifying the relative doses of each serotype to a 10:1:3 formulation. 62 Approaches such as this, to facilitate the pH1N1 virus to better compete, should be a focus for future research.…”

Section: (C)viral Interference Between Live Vaccine Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urgent challenges in implementing live attenuated influenza vaccine

Singanayagam

Zambon

Lalvani

et al. 2018

The Lancet Infectious Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryConflicting reports have emerged about the effectiveness of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). LAIV appears to be protecting particularly poorly against currently circulating H1N1 viruses that are derived from the 2009 pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) viruses. During the 2015/16 influenza season, when pH1N1 was the predominant virus, studies from the United States (US) reported a complete lack of effectiveness of LAIV in children. This led to a critical decision in the US to recommend that LAIV not be used in 2016/17 and to switch to the inactivated influenza vaccine. Other countries, including the UK, Canada and Finland, have continued to recommend use of LAIV. This policy divergence and uncertainty has far reaching implications for the entire global community, given the importance of LAIV production capability for pandemic preparedness. In this Personal View, we discuss possible explanations for the observed reduced effectiveness of LAIV and highlight underpinning scientific questions. Further research to understand the reasons for these observations is essential to enable informed public health policy and commercial decisions about vaccine production and development in coming years. 3 IntroductionInfluenza vaccination remains the main strategy to control the burden of seasonal influenza disease that affects 5-10% of adults and 20-30% of children, resulting in 250,000-500,000 deaths worldwide each year. 1,2 In the US, 140 million doses of vaccine are distributed each year and vaccination is estimated to prevent nearly a quarter of predicted influenza-associated deaths. 3 Vaccination is also the primary public health response to a global influenza pandemic.Influenza vaccines contain a mixture of three or four components designed to protect against the different viruses that circulate contemporaneously as seasonal influenza viruses. Currently, these are two influenza A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes) and two influenza B viruses (Victoria and Yamagata lineages). Vaccine components are reviewed and updated regularly by the WHO in line with observed antigenic drift of influenza viruses.The traditional inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) was introduced in the 1940s. IIV is administered by intramuscular/intradermal injection, is licensed for use in all ages and has a good safety record. However, effectiveness rates vary, averaging around 50-60%. 4,5 More recently, live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was demonstrated to have greater efficacy than IIV in children, with absolute efficacy rates of 75-80%. [6][7][8] Internal genes of LAIV viruses are derived from a cold-adapted, attenuated strain of virus, either Ann Arbor/1960 (from the US) or Leningrad/1957 (from Russia). Haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) surface antigens are engineered to be representative of currently circulating strains. LAIV is nasally administered and vaccine viruses replicate only in the air-cooled environment of the human upper respiratory tract. This results in a mild and self-limiting infection; virus cannot replicate at t...

show abstract

Factors Affecting the Immunogenicity of Oral Poliovirus Vaccine in Developing Countries: Review

Cited by 417 publications

References 55 publications

Systems vaccinology: Probing humanity’s diverse immune systems with vaccines

Systems vaccinology: Probing humanity’s diverse immune systems with vaccines

Causes of Impaired Oral Vaccine Efficacy in Developing Countries

Urgent challenges in implementing live attenuated influenza vaccine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About