2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0493-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the outcome of decompressive craniectomy for large hemispheric infarctions: a prospective cohort study

Abstract: We view decompressive craniectomy for space-occupying large hemispheric infarction as a life-sparing procedure that sometimes yields good functional outcomes. A dominant hemispheric infarction should not be an exclusion criterion when deciding to perform this operation. Early operation and careful patient selection based on the above-mentioned factors may improve the functional outcome of surgical management for large hemispheric infarction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
76
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
76
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies failed to find a significant improvement in outcome after DH in patients with such infarctions. 17,32,34 Our results show that functional outcome is unlikely to improve in these patients even after DH, but the survival of these patients should be highlighted, suggesting decompression's positive effect on mortality in patients with malignant ICA infarction. At 90 days following presentation, 75.9% of patients with a dominant-hemisphere infarction had poor outcome compared to 53.2% of patients with nondominanthemisphere involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies failed to find a significant improvement in outcome after DH in patients with such infarctions. 17,32,34 Our results show that functional outcome is unlikely to improve in these patients even after DH, but the survival of these patients should be highlighted, suggesting decompression's positive effect on mortality in patients with malignant ICA infarction. At 90 days following presentation, 75.9% of patients with a dominant-hemisphere infarction had poor outcome compared to 53.2% of patients with nondominanthemisphere involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This is related to an increased mass effect and risk of brain herniation with compression of vital structures and hemodynamically, higher impairment of autoregulation. 1,17 Decompressive hemicraniectomies for MCA-and ICA-territory infarcts were included in this study. Acute ICA-territory infarctions usually have a poorer prognosis than MCA-territory infarction, and cerebral edema is more severe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional prognostic considerations should include preexisting radiographic and neurologic signs of herniation and total infarct volume. 7,23 There is no evidence that laterality (dominant vs nondominant hemispheric infarction) affects long-term outcome, although severe language deficits may be considered unacceptable quality of life. 30,31 This meta-analysis has multiple limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Both nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that DC is most effective within 48 hours of stroke onset (early DC), 2,3,5,6 but despite decreased mortality, survivors often have poor functional outcomes secondary to stroke severity. 2,7 In 2007, a landmark interim pooled analysis of 3 RCTs demonstrated improved functional outcomes, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-3, for MCI patients treated with early DC. 6 However, this morbidity benefit was not present upon completion of the trials 5,8,9 ; nor has it been demonstrated in subsequent RCTs, 10,11 which employed a less stringent definition of acceptable functional outcome (mRS 0-4) with poor generalizability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supratentorial yerleşimli beyin damar hastalıklarından (malign orta serebral arter (OSA) infarktı, geniş kortikal ve lober hematomlar) sonra gelişen beyin ödemi unkal ve transtentorial herniasyona, infratentorial yerleşimli beyin damar hastalıklarından (serebellar infarkt, serebellum ve beyin sapı hematomları) hidrosefali, beyin sapı basısı, transforaminal tonsiller herniasyon gibi mortaliteyi arttırıcı klinik tablolara neden olurlar (3). Hangi hastaların dekompresyon cerrahisinden daha fazla fayda göreceğini inmenin başlangıcında tahmin etmek oldukça zor olmasına rağmen genel olarak kabul edilen radyolojik ve klinik olarak malign ödem için yüksek riskli olan hastalarda medikal tedaviye rağmen kitle etkisinde artış devam etmekteyse, dekompresyon cerrahisi yaşam kurtarıcı bir tedavi seçeneği olmaktadır (4,5). Bu yazıda, merkezimizde dekompresyon cerrahisi uygulanan akut inme olguları sunularak, operasyondan sonraki izlem süreleri, sağ kalım oranları ve dizabilite skorları son literatür bilgileriyle birlikte karşılaştırıldı ve tartışıldı.…”
Section: ) Intraserebral Hemoraji (İh) %15 (%10-15)unclassified