Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information

Abstract

Background Internet represents a relevant source of information, but reliability of data that can be obtained by the web is still an unsolved issue. Non-reliable online information may have a relevance, especially in taking decisions related to health problems. Uncertainties on the quality of online health data may have a negative impact on health-related choices of citizens. Objective This work consisted in a cross-sectional literature review of published papers on online health information. The two main research objectives consisted in the analysis of trends in the use of health web sites and in the quality assessment and reliability levels of web medical sites. Methods Literature research was made using four digital reference databases, namely PubMed, British Medical Journal, Biomed, and CINAHL. Entries used were “trustworthy of medical information online,” “survey to evaluate medical information online,” “medical information online,” and “habits of web-based health information users”. Analysis included only papers published in English. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to conduct quality checks of selected works. Results Literature analysis using the above entries resulted in 212 studies. Twenty-four articles in line with study objectives, and user characteristics were selected. People more prone to use the internet for obtaining health information were females, younger people, scholars, and employees. Reliability of different online health sites is an issue taken into account by the majority of people using the internet for obtaining health information and physician assistance could help people to surf more safe health web sites. Conclusions Limited health information and/or web literacy can cause misunderstandings in evaluating medical data found in the web. An appropriate education plan and evaluation tools could enhance user skills and bring to a more cautious analysis of health information found in the web.

Availability and readability of online patient information on clubfoot: Assessment of paediatric hospital clubfoot web pages

“… 26 , 27 Prior work has found that patients with greater health illiteracy may not completely comprehend and may misuse medications, skip appointments, among other negative effects, which leads to worse healthcare outcomes. 28 While low levels of health literacy have been linked to poorer comprehension of orthopaedic care, it remains unclear what the specific effect of low comprehensibility of OPI might be on patient outcomes in clubfoot care and paediatric orthopaedic care more generally. 29…”

The Recent Progress and Applications of Digital Technologies in Healthcare: A Review

“…It has been shown that telemedicine can enhance and optimize the work of community and hospital pharmacies [112][113][114][115]. It was demonstrated that telemedicine services provided after-hours by pharmacists in three community hospitals without 24-hour pharmacy services led to the improvement of drug safety since prescribing accuracy was verified [116,117]. The telemedicine can help to resolve the medication-related problems such as medication and prescription errors.…”

Can Medical Students Evaluate Medical Websites?

“…inaccurate, unsubstantiated or inappropriate) is time-consuming and difficult. 6 Before the Internet, medical practitioners and students relied on librarians as information gatekeepers; for Internet information, many human gate-keepers have been removed. Physicians rely on medical search engines (e.g.…”