2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors affecting the results of concrete compression testing: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that small size samples were used here considering the size of the reactor. This may lead to a greater CO 2 uptake capacity and compressive strength compared to larger size samples due to the diffusion depth of the carbonation curing process, 21 but it does not affect the intercomparison of the dolomite additive Portland cement (DPC) samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that small size samples were used here considering the size of the reactor. This may lead to a greater CO 2 uptake capacity and compressive strength compared to larger size samples due to the diffusion depth of the carbonation curing process, 21 but it does not affect the intercomparison of the dolomite additive Portland cement (DPC) samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare compressive strengths of concrete with different dimensions, size effect should be considered [4]. However, current research, studied the size effect of concrete subjected to uniaxial compression, showed that the strengths of φ150 × 300 mm and φ100 × 200 mm cylinders with the same length-to-diameter ratio (L/D) are almost the same for lower strength concrete [20][21][22]. Therefore, the conversion factor that accounts for the different sizes of concrete specimens was not considered in this test program.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compression test is a significant phenomenon related to concrete. Compressive strength varies depending upon the size of the specimen and the change in strength is different for different geometries [26]. GA is faster and more efficient than traditional methods and optimizes both continuous and discreet functions.…”
Section: Figure 3 Cube Molds Filled With Concretementioning
confidence: 99%