1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf03394194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Affecting the Strength of the Vicious Circle Phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure to obtain an effect of the start procedures in the overall analysis of run speeds may have been prevented by a ceiling effect for the two groups punished in the alley and by a floor effect for the two groups punished in the goalbox. The findings that the guillotine-door procedure produced faster running speeds in extinction for no-punished animals than did the drop-box procedure is inconsistent with the results of an experiment reported by Delprato and Meltzer (1974) and directly the opposite of results reported by Delude (1973). Moreover, in those studies , the guillotine-door procedure did not produce self-punitive respondin g, but it did produce such respondin g in the present study .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The failure to obtain an effect of the start procedures in the overall analysis of run speeds may have been prevented by a ceiling effect for the two groups punished in the alley and by a floor effect for the two groups punished in the goalbox. The findings that the guillotine-door procedure produced faster running speeds in extinction for no-punished animals than did the drop-box procedure is inconsistent with the results of an experiment reported by Delprato and Meltzer (1974) and directly the opposite of results reported by Delude (1973). Moreover, in those studies , the guillotine-door procedure did not produce self-punitive respondin g, but it did produce such respondin g in the present study .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, both the D-D and G-D groups continued to leave the start box with short response latencies throughout the test period. The response latencies of the G-G Group, however, showed the same rapid decay found in previous studies when punishment was applied in conjunction with the guillotine door (Delude, 1973). Although the D-D and G-D groups showed no differences in performance as a function of the different treatment received (F < 1), the running speed of the G-G Group was significantly inferior to both the G-D Group (F = 12.29, df = 1/8, p < 0.01) and the D-D Group (F = 49.48, df -1/8, p < 0.01).…”
Section: Latencies To Criterionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…28, No. 2 cent of the rats tested with the gate-lift technique in this study and two previous ones (Delude, 1969(Delude, ,1973 did show marked response persistence in the presence of punishment Perhaps, then, future research should be concerned with isolating those factors which account for the failure of these animals to show a normal inhibitory response to punishment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations