2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors and clinical outcomes for standard and mini-implants retaining mandibular overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mini-implants (MDIs) are one-piece implants and belong to the first and the narrowest category (category 1) of narrow diameter implants (diameter ≤ 2.5 mm) [ 15 ]. The MDIs have been approved as a suitable treatment option for retention of mandibular complete overdentures in subjects with narrow ridges in many follow-up studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. A recent study recommended MDIs even for the support of crowns or small bridges in the mandibular incisor region [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mini-implants (MDIs) are one-piece implants and belong to the first and the narrowest category (category 1) of narrow diameter implants (diameter ≤ 2.5 mm) [ 15 ]. The MDIs have been approved as a suitable treatment option for retention of mandibular complete overdentures in subjects with narrow ridges in many follow-up studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. A recent study recommended MDIs even for the support of crowns or small bridges in the mandibular incisor region [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anatomical limitations of the alveolar ridge, which are related to severe resorptions, may contraindicate conventional implant treatment [ 10 ]; pre-implantation procedures, such as residual ridge augmentation, guided tissue regeneration, vertical distraction osteogenesis or ridge split interventions, may be necessary. The use of MDIs does not require such interventions, and ensures the long-term stabilization of overdentures [ 11 ], as the minimum width required to insert these implants is 4–5 mm [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings were reported by Tomasi et al (2013), who found a mean plaque score of 20%, a mean bleeding on probing of 30%, and a mean probing depth of 2.3 mm at the 12-month follow-up. A systematic review suggested that mini implants have a lower risk of plaque accumulation than standard-diameter implants (Borges et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%