Background
Standard therapy for localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma includes surgical resection and neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy (+/-chemotherapy and locoregional hyperthermia). No difference in oncologic outcomes for patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiation therapy was reported, whereas side effect profiles differ. The aim of this analysis was to analyse oncologic outcomes and wound healing complications in patients treated with multimodal treatment.
Methods
Oncologic outcomes and major wound complications (MWC, subclassified as wound healing disorder, infection, abscess, fistula, seroma and hematoma) were evaluated in all 84 patients with localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma undergoing multimodal treatment, and also separately for the subgroup of lower extremity tumors. Clinical factors and treatment modalities (especially neoadjuvant versus adjuvant radiotherapy) were evaluated regarding their prognostic value and impact on postoperative wound complications.
Results
Oncologic outcome was dependent on tumor localization (worse for retroperitoneal sarcomas) and number of high risk features (tumor size, depth to superficial fascia and grading), but not on therapy sequencing (however with higher risk patients in the neoadjuvant group). Different risk factors influenced different subclasses of wound healing complications. No difference in MWC-rate in the whole cohort was found between patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiation therapy (31.4% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.168). Except for wound infections, no significant differences were observed between neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Diabetes was confirmed as a major risk factor for immune-related wound complications.
Conclusion
Rates of major wound complications in this cohort are comparable to published data, higher rates of wound infections were observed after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Patient age and diabetes seem to be major risk factors. The number of risk factors for high risk soft tissue sarcoma seem to influence oncologic outcomes. Neoadjuvant treatment increases the risk only for wound infection treated with oral or intravenous antibiotic therapy and appears to be a safe option at an experienced tertiary center in absence of other risk factors.