2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with child protection recurrence in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
9
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The inconsistencies may be explained by variation in study design features (e.g., cross-sectional vs. longitudinal, prospective vs. retrospective), length of follow-up periods, the age range of abusive experiences, and how age at abuse is conceptualized (e.g., age at first or final incident, or an “index” incident, as is the case in this study). Our results suggest that individuals sexually abused before the age of 12 were at greater risk of sexual assault revictimization and violence revictimization, consistent with recent longitudinal work (Jenkins et al, 2018; Pittenger et al, 2018). Interestingly, our previous research involving a subset of the current sample found that an older age at abuse (12–16 years) predicted more frequent and chronic patterns of interpersonal revictimization over time (Papalia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inconsistencies may be explained by variation in study design features (e.g., cross-sectional vs. longitudinal, prospective vs. retrospective), length of follow-up periods, the age range of abusive experiences, and how age at abuse is conceptualized (e.g., age at first or final incident, or an “index” incident, as is the case in this study). Our results suggest that individuals sexually abused before the age of 12 were at greater risk of sexual assault revictimization and violence revictimization, consistent with recent longitudinal work (Jenkins et al, 2018; Pittenger et al, 2018). Interestingly, our previous research involving a subset of the current sample found that an older age at abuse (12–16 years) predicted more frequent and chronic patterns of interpersonal revictimization over time (Papalia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, while female CSA victims appear to be at greater risk of sexual revictimization than male victims, there is some evidence to suggest that the magnitude of the relationship between CSA and sexual revictimization is stronger among males (c.f., Desai et al, 2002; Elliott et al, 2004; Matta Oshima et al, 2014; Nelson et al, 2002; Pittenger et al, 2018; Werner et al, 2016). Some studies have found that individuals experiencing sexual revictimization report being younger at the time of their initial sexual abuse compared to individuals not revictimized (Casey & Nurius, 2005; Jenkins et al, 2018; Pittenger et al, 2018). Others have shown that CSA occurring during adolescence is associated with increased risk of revictimization (Humphrey & White, 2000; Palusci & Ilardi, 2019; Siegel & Williams, 2003), and others still have found no effect of age (Jankowski et al, 2002; Maker et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although marginally significant, we found that the provision of child support services reduced the risk of resubstantiation for child neglect cases ( p = 0.056). This finding is in line with findings from previous studies that reported positive effects of service provisions (Jang et al, ; Jenkins et al, ; Jonson‐Reid, Emery et al, ; Kang et al, ). However, these effects were not significant in other maltreatment cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some studies have found that increased contact with CPS workers and the provision of child welfare services increase the risk of being rereported for child maltreatment (Bae, Solomon, & Gelles, ; Connell et al, ; Drake et al, ; Fluke et al, ; Fuller & Nieto, ). Other studies have found that receiving child welfare services decreases the risk of repeated occurrences of child maltreatment (Jang et al, ; Jenkins, Tilbury, Hayes, & Mazerolle, ; Jonson‐Reid, Emery et al, ; Kang et al, ). Thus, further investigation is needed to clarify this contradictory finding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 18 There is also evidence that children whose parents experience these forms of adversity are more likely to be subject to repeated child protection intervention. 19 20 Therefore, in this study, we examined the extent to which LA-specific prevalence of health indicators for maternal adversity prior to birth explained variation in rate of infant entry into care among LAs in England. With this work, we aim to inform national and local policy strategies to mitigate long-lasting harm to children arising from serious parental adversity and diminished capacity to parent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%