2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03361-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with community commitment among older adults: a stratified analysis of community group leaders and members

Abstract: Background Community commitment through group activities in the community is associated with improved health outcomes in older adults and has a ripple effect on community development. However, factors associated with community commitment through group activities in the community have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to examine individual factors and group-related factors in association with community commitment among older adult leaders and members of community groups in Japan. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our results showed that the average CCS score among OAPs overall was 11.1 (SD = 3.9), with 11.7 (SD = 3.4) in the group with high HBSO scores and 10.5 (SD = 4.3) in the group with low HBSO scores. Previous studies found an average CCS score of 14.5 (SD = 4.1) for the general urban older population (44) and 17.2 (SD = 3.7) for older people participating in community activities in urban areas (45). Similar to results of the LSNS-6, OAPs in our study were found to have lower CCS scores than older adults who were actively engaged in community activities, as well as older adults in general and even physically frail older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, our results showed that the average CCS score among OAPs overall was 11.1 (SD = 3.9), with 11.7 (SD = 3.4) in the group with high HBSO scores and 10.5 (SD = 4.3) in the group with low HBSO scores. Previous studies found an average CCS score of 14.5 (SD = 4.1) for the general urban older population (44) and 17.2 (SD = 3.7) for older people participating in community activities in urban areas (45). Similar to results of the LSNS-6, OAPs in our study were found to have lower CCS scores than older adults who were actively engaged in community activities, as well as older adults in general and even physically frail older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In comparison, the scores of the general Japanese population were as follows: All HLS-EU-Q47 25.3 (8.2), HLS-EU-Q47 HP 25.5 (9.2), HLS-EU-Q47 DP 22.7 (9.2), and HLS-EU-Q47 HC 25.7 (8.6) [37]. Additionally, the scores for older urban residents in Japan were as follows: All HLS-EU-Q47 27.5 (8.8), HLS-EU-Q47 HP 25.6 (10.2), HLS-EU-Q47 DP 31.2 (9.8), and HLS-EU-Q47 HC 26.0 (9.7) [39]. The health literacy scores for CHWs of Q1 group, with the lowest COCS-N scores, were higher than those of the general Japanese public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high score indicate a high degree of community commitment. This scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.75 among local volunteers in Japan [39]. Similar to HL, CCS scores were recorded for the overall CCS and the subscales on socializing and belonging.…”
Section: Community Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The high and low COCS-N score groups were analyzed separately. Then, based on previous studies that conducted stratified analysis, differences between the COCS-N scores and the independent variables were compared using t-tests and χ 2 tests [33]. Logistic regression analysis was performed in an attempt to identify the key determinants of COCS-N scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the CHWs' average overall CCS scores were 16.4 (SD = 3.9), with the high COCS-N score group averaging 17.7 (SD = 3.7) and the low COCS-N score group averaging 15.3 (SD = 3.7). Previous studies found average CCS scores of 14.5 (SD = 4.1) for the general urban older population [42], 13.0 (SD = 4.3) for mothers raising children [43], and 17.2 (SD = 3.7) for older people participating in community activities in urban areas [33]. Thus, the overall scores we obtained were higher than those of mothers raising children and older people in general, but lower than those of older people participating in community activities in urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%