2021
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1942431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Brazilian study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of social support has been reported to be a predictor of the psychological impact of the pandemic in older adults with and without chronic diseases (10,24). These findings are consistent with the results of the correlation analyses presented here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lack of social support has been reported to be a predictor of the psychological impact of the pandemic in older adults with and without chronic diseases (10,24). These findings are consistent with the results of the correlation analyses presented here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A total of 65 unique samples from 62 studies involving 196 950 participants from Latin America were included in this meta-analysis (Badellino et al ., 2020, 2022; Campos et al ., 2020, 2021 a , 2021 b ; Chen et al ., 2021 a , 2021 b ; Civantos et al ., 2020; Cortés-Álvarez et al ., 2020; Dal'Bosco et al ., 2020; De Boni et al ., 2020; Fernández et al ., 2020; Giardino et al ., 2020; Guiroy et al ., 2020; Malgor et al ., 2020; Martinez et al ., 2020; Medeiros et al ., 2020; Mier-Bolio et al ., 2020; Monterrosa-Castro et al ., 2020; Mora-Magaña et al ., 2020; Passos et al ., 2020; Paz et al ., 2020; Samaniego et al ., 2020; Schuch et al ., 2020; Yáñez et al ., 2020; Antiporta et al ., 2021; Boluarte-Carbajal et al ., 2021; Brito-Marques et al ., 2021; Cayo-Rojas et al ., 2021; Cénat et al ., 2021; Dantas et al ., 2021; de Oliveira Andrade et al ., 2021; Espinosa-Guerra et al ., 2021; Esteves et al ., 2021; Fernandez et al ., 2021; Ferreira et al ., 2021; Feter et al ., 2021; Flores-Torres et al ., 2021; García-Espinosa et al ., 2021; Goularte et al ., 2021; Landaeta-Díaz et al ., 2021; Loret de Mola et al ., 2021; Mautong et al ., 2021; Mendonca et al ., 2021; Mota et al ., 2021; Nayak et al ., 2021; Puccinelli et al ., 2021; Ribeiro et al ., 2021; Schmitt Jr et al ., 2021; Scotta et al ., 2021; Serafim et al ., 2021; Souza et al ., 2021; Torrente et al ., 2021 a , 2021 b ; Villela et al ., 2021; Vitorino et al ., 2021; Werneck et al ., 2021; Zhang et al ., 2021 a , 2021 c ; da Silva Júnior et al ., 2021; Robles et al ., 2021) (Table 1 and online Supplementary Table S2). Some studies include multiple independent samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study examined the prevalence of both general healthcare workers and frontline healthcare workers. Among them, 35 samples (53.85%) were of general populations (Passos et al ., 2020; Antiporta et al ., 2021; Boluarte-Carbajal et al ., 2021; de Oliveira Andrade et al ., 2021; Espinosa-Guerra et al ., 2021; Ferreira et al ., 2021; Landaeta-Díaz et al ., 2021; Mautong et al ., 2021; Ribeiro et al ., 2021; Schmitt Jr et al ., 2021; Souza et al ., 2021; Torrente et al ., 2021 b ; Vitorino et al ., 2021; Badellino et al ., 2022), two samples (3.08%) were of frontline healthcare workers (Dal'Bosco et al ., 2020; Robles et al ., 2021), 19 samples (29.22%) were from general healthcare workers (Chen et al ., 2020; Civantos et al ., 2020; Giardino et al ., 2020; Guiroy et al ., 2020; Malgor et al ., 2020; Monterrosa-Castro et al ., 2020; Mora-Magaña et al ., 2020; Samaniego et al ., 2020; Yáñez et al ., 2020; Zhang et al ., 2021 a ; Villela et al ., 2021; Nayak et al ., 2021; Dantas et al ., 2021; Mota et al ., 2021; Brito-Marques et al ., 2021; Campos et al ., 2021 b ; Mier-Bolio et al ., 2020; Robles et al ., 2021) and nine samples (13.85%) were based on university students (Medeiros et al ., 2020; Campos et al ., 2021 a ; Cayo-Rojas et al ., 2021; Esteves et al ., 2021; Fernandez et al ., 2021; García-Espinosa et al ., 2021; Mendonca et al ., 2021; Scotta et al ., 2021; da Silva Júnior et al ., 2021). Of the 62 studies, 32 were from Brazil (49.22%) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations