2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with IT audits by the internal audit function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) prior to the Act only required testing of the effectiveness of internal controls if the auditor planned to rely on those controls, Section 404 eliminated that choice for public companies (Hoag and Hollingsworth, 2011). With respect to IT audits specifically, Abdolmohammadi and Boss (2010) find that SOX brought recognition to the dominant role of information systems within organizations while simultaneously increasing pressure on the IAF to assume primary responsibility for the controls over their companies' IT systems. Internal auditors can no longer rely on strong guidance from their external auditors with respect to IT audits as the provisions of SOX 201(a) prohibit external auditors from serving as financial information system designers and internal audit outsource providers.…”
Section: Background Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) prior to the Act only required testing of the effectiveness of internal controls if the auditor planned to rely on those controls, Section 404 eliminated that choice for public companies (Hoag and Hollingsworth, 2011). With respect to IT audits specifically, Abdolmohammadi and Boss (2010) find that SOX brought recognition to the dominant role of information systems within organizations while simultaneously increasing pressure on the IAF to assume primary responsibility for the controls over their companies' IT systems. Internal auditors can no longer rely on strong guidance from their external auditors with respect to IT audits as the provisions of SOX 201(a) prohibit external auditors from serving as financial information system designers and internal audit outsource providers.…”
Section: Background Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Internal auditors can no longer rely on strong guidance from their external auditors with respect to IT audits as the provisions of SOX 201(a) prohibit external auditors from serving as financial information system designers and internal audit outsource providers. In addition, SOX 404 tasks management with internal control system evaluation and documentation which management in turn assigned to the IAF (Abdolmohammadi and Boss, 2010).…”
Section: Background Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, auditing researchers have tended avoid trying to understand the social context, particularly in terms of contemporary audit practice (Robson, Humphrey, Khalifa & Jones, 2007). Finally, according to Abdolmohammadi and Boss (2010), research has focused on addressing the changes in external auditing while very few studies are driven by the internal audit view.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Most of the previous research has focused on addressing the changes in external auditing, while very few are driven by internal auditing perspective (Abdolmohammadi and Boss, 2010).…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the internal audit cost has become unavoidable in most organisations as a result of the complexity of recent ERP-related IT and the increasingly importance of the IAF as an effective corporate governance mechanism (Abdolmohammadi and Boss, 2010;Petter et al, 2008). To engage in more IT audits in the ERP system working environment the internal audit department size would be reviewed (Abdolmohammadi and Boss, 2010).…”
Section: Internal Audit Change To Maintain Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%