2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Associated with Negative Direct Sputum Examination in Asian and African HIV-Infected Patients with Tuberculosis (ANRS 1260)

Abstract: ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with negative direct sputum examination among African and Cambodian patients co-infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV.DesignProspective multicenter study (ANRS1260) conducted in Cambodia, Senegal and Central African Republic.MethodsUnivariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) were used to identify clinical and radiological features associated with negative direct sputum examination in HIV-infected patients with positive M. tuberculosis culture on L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 120 sputum samples were collected, out of which 85 (70.83%) patients showed a positive incidence for different bacterial and fungal pathogens, which included S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida spp., and were also reported by [41]. All samples were non-AFB sputum samples but also showed the presence of other pathogens, which has been already confirmed in a Cambodian study by [42]. Hence, it was concluded from the study that the sputum samples that were negative for AFB also showed the incidence of pathogenic bacterial isolates such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia spp., Enterobacter spp., and Candida spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this study, 120 sputum samples were collected, out of which 85 (70.83%) patients showed a positive incidence for different bacterial and fungal pathogens, which included S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida spp., and were also reported by [41]. All samples were non-AFB sputum samples but also showed the presence of other pathogens, which has been already confirmed in a Cambodian study by [42]. Hence, it was concluded from the study that the sputum samples that were negative for AFB also showed the incidence of pathogenic bacterial isolates such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Moraxella catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia spp., Enterobacter spp., and Candida spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…First, in more than 50% in all cases there was no culture confirmation of TB. Unfortunately, it is well known that sputum microscopy and culture both suffer from decreased sensitivity in HIV-infected individuals [38] , [39] . We like to point out that we only included patients with bacteriological proof or clinical and radiological signs of tuberculosis, plus a positive treatment response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16 , 17 ] A concurrent respiratory infection was reported to be associated with negative AFB. [ 18 ] The presence of a pulmonary cavity, age, and a positive interferon-γ release assay could predict positive BALF-AFB in sputum smear-negative patients. [ 19 ] Hence, several factors appear to influence the positivity of BALF-AFB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%