2016
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with perforator stroke after selective basilar artery angioplasty or stenting

Abstract: Diabetes, time from last symptom to procedure, and pre-procedure stenosis percentage may be factors affecting the risk of perforator stroke associated with basilar artery angioplasty and/or stenting. These factors should be considered in planning of potential basilar artery angioplasty and/or stenting and prospectively evaluated in future multicenter trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the incidence of endpoint events in patients receiving intensive medication is lower than that of patients who receive intracranial stenting, the incidence of endpoint events is still high and unacceptable. The adverse events in these studies occurred after Winspan stenting, suggesting that such adverse events may be related to the open-loop design, large radial force, high head-end hardness, and severe tortuosity of Wingspan stents that make them difficult to pass through blood vessels; in addition, the Wingspan stent is difficult to operate and can easily induce perforating branch events [13]. Therefore, based on our experience in the treatment intracranial aneurysms, we chose Enterprise stents in our present study, which is a more mature stent for ICAS treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the incidence of endpoint events in patients receiving intensive medication is lower than that of patients who receive intracranial stenting, the incidence of endpoint events is still high and unacceptable. The adverse events in these studies occurred after Winspan stenting, suggesting that such adverse events may be related to the open-loop design, large radial force, high head-end hardness, and severe tortuosity of Wingspan stents that make them difficult to pass through blood vessels; in addition, the Wingspan stent is difficult to operate and can easily induce perforating branch events [13]. Therefore, based on our experience in the treatment intracranial aneurysms, we chose Enterprise stents in our present study, which is a more mature stent for ICAS treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bowstring effect should be avoided when loosening the balloon and stent system intraoperatively to prevent tearing of the perforating vessels and to achieve sub-satisfactory results once the balloon is expanded [21]. Perforator stroke (PS) is one of the most common complications of intracranial angioplasty and/or stent implantation [13]. The basilar artery is the most common site of PS among all perforator-rich areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bowstring effect should be avoided when loosening the balloon and stent system intraoperatively to prevent tearing of the perforating vessels and to achieve sub-satisfactory results once the balloon is expanded [21] . Perforator stroke (PS) is one of the most common complications of intracranial angioplasty and/or stent implantation [22] . The basilar artery is the most common site of PS among all perforator-rich areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time from last symptom to procedure may affect the risk of perforator stroke associated with intracranial artery angioplasty and/or stenting. The time from last symptom to procedure of <18 days is a risk factor to induce perforator stroke 16. The plaques lying in the stenosis artery are unstable in the acute stage and the ‘snowplowing’ effect of intracranial stenting could result in periprocedural perforator stroke 17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%