Factors Associated with Psychological Distress among Filipinos during Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic Crisis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, psychological reactions of the population play a critical role in both the spread of the disease and the occurrence of emotional distress and social disorder.
 AIM: This study aimed to measure the prevalence and severity of psychological distress to evaluate the current mental health burden on society that leads to the provision of a concrete basis for tailoring and implementing relevant mental health intervention policies to efficiently and effectively respond to the challenges brought by the pandemic.
 METHODS: An anonymous, internet-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to April 2020. In this regard, a structured online questionnaire was utilized to collect sociodemographic data and the COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the sociodemographic and prevalence of CPDI among respondents. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of distress.
 RESULTS: Most of the respondents did not feel distressed about COVID-19 (52.1%), whereas 39.5% and 8.4% had mild-to-moderate and severe distress. The regression analysis demonstrated that higher religion and faithfulness levels, lower levels of education, and living in Mindanao (unlike those living in the Visayas) were associated with lower levels of psychological distress among the Filipino respondents during the COVID-19 pandemic.
 CONCLUSIONS: Policy-makers and practitioners in the in Filipino society need to consider key factors such as religion, education, and the region where they live in to reduce psychological distress among Filipinos.

Reentry Following COVID-19: Concerns for Singers

“…Nearly a third of the study's respondents reported symptoms of peritraumatic distress during the pandemic lockdown in China. Similar levels of distress were reported in Italian, 73 French, 74 and Filipino studies, 75 Iranian, 76 and Brazilian 77 studies reported moderate to severe distress in over 60% of their participants. While CPDI levels in many of these studies declined when lockdown periods were lifted, meta-analyses of trauma literature have predictively linked severe levels of peritraumatic distress to subsequent psychopathology.…”

Depression and anxiety in Malaysian population during third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

“… 1 The COVID-19 epidemic had a gripping impact not only on health workers, 2 , 3 but also over general population. 4 , 5 , 6…”

Psychological distress during pandemic Covid-19 among adult general population: Result across 13 countries

“…Many studies showed the adverse psychological health effects following quarantine which include emotional disturbance, depression, stress, low mood, irritability, insomnia, post-traumatic stress symptoms, anger, and emotional exhaustion. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The reported adverse psychological effects following quarantine include post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, anger, stress due to longer quarantine duration, fear of contracting the virus, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. 11 Ethnic group differences, to some extent, have contributed to the level of psychological distress.…”