Factors associated with research productivity in higher education institutions in Africa: a systematic review

Abstract

Background: There are low levels of research productivity among Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Africa, a situation that is likely to compromise the development agenda of the continent if not addressed. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize evidence of the factors associated with research productivity in HEIs in Africa and the researchers’ motives for research. Methods: We identified 838 publications related to research productivity in HEIs in Africa from various databases, from which we included 28 papers for review. The inclusion criteria were that (i) the paper’s primary focus was on factors associated with research productivity, and motivations of doing research among faculty members in Africa; (ii) the setting was the HEIs in Africa; (iii) the type of publication was peer-reviewed papers and book chapters based on primary or secondary data analysis; and (iv) the language was English or French. Essays, opinions, blogs, editorials, reviews, and commentaries were excluded. Results: Most of the studies operationalized research productivity as either journal publications or conference proceedings. Both institutional and individual factors are associated with the level of research productivity in HEIs in Africa. Institutional factors include the availability of research funding, level of institutional networking, and the degree of research collaborations, while individual factors include personal motivation, academic qualifications, and research self-efficacy. Conclusions: Deliberate efforts in HEIs in Africa that addressed both individual and institutional barriers to research productivity are promising. This study recommends that the leadership of HEIs in Africa prioritizes the funding of research to enable researchers to contribute to the development agenda of the continent. Moreover, HEIs should build institutional support to research through the provision of research enabling environment, policies and incentives; strengthening of researchers’ capabilities through relevant training courses, mentorship and coaching; and embracing networking and collaboration opportunities.

Promoting diversity and overcoming publication barriers in Latin American neuroscience and Alzheimer's disease research: A call to action

“…It is necessary to highlight that researchers from other countries also suffer from the same barriers, which reinforces the need for the discussion brought about by this article. Thus, in India, paying publication fees can be a barrier; 42 in China, there are problems with English proficiency; 43 research funding in Africa proves to be a barrier; 44 and problems with career advancement occur in Singapore. 45 …”

Towards Diversifying Early Language Development Research: First Truly Global International Summer/ Winter School on Language Acquisition (/L+/) 2021

“…First, attendees can strengthen their networks through active participation in a conference. Vertical links between students or early career researchers and senior researchers can help obtain training opportunities and advice, and horizontal links between researchers of the same seniority are associated with higher productivity, dissemination, and funding (e.g., Cloete et al, 2015;Uwizeye et al, 2022). In addition, depending on the structure of the conference, attendees may be able to see others from similar backgrounds attending and giving lectures (providing them and others with 1 Although our paper may benefit all readers who are interested in increasing research diversity, we have tailored it to two types of readers who may benefit the most from our paper: First, readers who are thinking of organizing educational events, conferences, or workshops, and want to do this in a way that will increase participant and presenter diversity, and second, researchers of all levels who are based in parts of the world that are less commonly represented in the literature.…”

Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Bibliometric Study of Contributions from Africa

“…This means that the registered advantage of these four continents over the remaining parts of the continent is not due to population size. This is rather due to other factors such as the higher quality of research capacities in these countries, the existence of a robust research infrastructure, and the development of efficient research policies and funding programs [67]. This can be also related to the higher density of medical workers in these four countries (>20 per 10,000 citizens) [68].…”