“…According to the NOS, 27 studies were classified as high quality, of which seven were “nine stars” ( Mercer et al, 2015 , 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2016 ; Meissner et al, 2017 ; Pawar et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Hellgren et al, 2021 ), fifteen were “eight stars” ( Yun et al, 2014 , 2016 ; Arkema et al, 2015 ; Listing et al, 2015 ; Richter et al, 2016 ; Desai et al, 2016 ; Kim et al, 2017 ; Low et al, 2017 ; Rutherford et al, 2018 ; Dreyer et al, 2018 ; Grøn et al, 2019; Grøn et al, 2020 ; Pawar et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2021 ; Ozen et al, 2021 ), and five were “seven stars” ( Raaschou et al, 2015 ; Curtis et al, 2016 ; de Germay et al, 2020 ; Kim et al, 2020 ; Patel et al, 2021 ). Four studies were considered moderate quality, of which two scored “six stars” ( Harada et al, 2017 ; Sakai et al, 2018 ), one “five stars” ( Rahman et al, 2020 ), and one “four stars” ( Pettipher and Benitha, 2020 ) ( Supplementary Table S4 ).…”