1998
DOI: 10.1002/hep.510270505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with serum alanine transaminase activity in healthy subjects: Consequences for the definition of normal values, for selection of blood donors, and for patients with chronic hepatitis C

Abstract: In clinical research, the definition of the upper limit of normal (ULN) alanine transaminase (ALT) is never detailed. However, such a definition can vary and may have practical consequences. Our aim was to assess factors associated with serum ALT activity in apparently healthy subjects and then to apply seven different definitions of ULN in three different populations so as to assess the prevalence of subjects with normal ALT among blood donors and among hepatitis C patients before (normal ALT hepatitis C pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
174
3
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
174
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, both the negative and positive predictive values for NASH are poor. We also analyzed the diagnostic utility of ALT applying the upper level of 44 U/L in subjects with a BMI Ͼ23 kg/m 2 (which is obviously all of our cohort), as suggested by Piton et al 23 For NASH, the sensitivity was 18%, specificity 96%, and negative and positive predictive values were 71% and 70%, respectively. Taken together, irrespective of the multiple ALT standards suggested to date, no cutoff value is diagnostically useful to detect the presence of NASH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, both the negative and positive predictive values for NASH are poor. We also analyzed the diagnostic utility of ALT applying the upper level of 44 U/L in subjects with a BMI Ͼ23 kg/m 2 (which is obviously all of our cohort), as suggested by Piton et al 23 For NASH, the sensitivity was 18%, specificity 96%, and negative and positive predictive values were 71% and 70%, respectively. Taken together, irrespective of the multiple ALT standards suggested to date, no cutoff value is diagnostically useful to detect the presence of NASH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The extent of liver cell necrosis and degree of elevated ALT level do not always correlate, and ALT measurements may fail to identify patients with necro-inflammatory activity or fibrosis, as seen in hepatitis C [12,13]. In addition, the ALT activity may vary with body mass index, sex, abnormal lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as well as the time of the day [14,15].…”
Section: Fallacies Of Alt Levels For Prediction Of Liver Injury and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALT more than 30 IU/L is regarded as elevated level of ALT by some investigators. 17,18 It may be possible to discard donor blood with elevated ALT and anti-HBc positivity. Next, NAT screening may be accomplished as a pilot project in some establishment and after analysis of pros and cons, expanded usage of NAT may be considered.…”
Section: Anti-hbc Screening Of Blood Donors In Bangladesh: Relevance mentioning
confidence: 99%