Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability and validity of using a telephone-based version of the spinal cord injury-secondary conditions scale (SCI-SCS). Trial design: A psychometric study was conducted. Setting: The study was conducted in Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Participants: Forty people with a complete or an incomplete spinal cord injury. Methods: Inter-rater reliability was tested by comparing the telephone-based version of the SCI-SCS administered on two different days by two different telephone assessors. Validity was tested by comparing the telephone-based version of the SCI-SCS with the paper-based version of the SCI-SCS. Results: The median (interquartile range) age and time since injury were 54 (48-63) years and 28 (14-35) years, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) reflecting the agreement between the telephone-based version of the SCI-SCS administered on two different days by two different assessors was 0.96 (0.93-0.98). The corresponding value reflecting agreement between the telephone-based assessment and the paper-based assessment was 0.90 (0.83-0.95).
Conclusion:The telephone-based version of the SCI-SCS is a simple and a quick questionnaire to administer that has both inter-rater reliability and validity. It may be useful as a way to screen for secondary health conditions in low-and middle-income countries where it is not always feasible to provide routine face-to-face follow-ups and where literacy may be a problem. Spinal Cord (2016) 54, 402-405; doi:10.1038/sc.2015.119; published online 21 July 2015
INTRODUCTIONPeople with spinal cord injury (SCI) are susceptible to various secondary health conditions (that is, complications). These conditions have an impact on physical health, psychological well-being, quality of life and community participation. [1][2][3][4][5] The common secondary health conditions after SCI include pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections, deep vein thrombosis, spasticity, pain, respiratory problems and autonomic dysreflexia. 6 Some of these can be life threatening. In high-income countries, people with SCI are regularly followed up and assessed by clinicians for secondary health conditions. However, this level of service is often not feasible in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). It is therefore important to find inexpensive ways to screen people for secondary health conditions that do not require costly and regular face-to-face assessments. If those at high risk of secondary health conditions could be identified, then they could be targeted for follow-up with clinicians and further investigation.There is currently only one assessment scale that is quick and easy to use and may provide a way for clinicians in LMIC to screen people with SCI for secondary health conditions. The assessment scale is called the Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS). 7 It was first published in 2007 and is an adaptation of the generic Seekins Secondary Condition Que...