Introduction and Hypothesis
To compare fecal incontinence (FI) and urinary incontinence (UI) disclosure in women with dual incontinence (DI), and to assess UI disclosure in DI subjects compared to women with UI alone. We hypothesized that women with DI would be less likely to disclose fecal incontinence (FI) in comparison to urinary incontinence (UI) and as likely to disclose UI as women with UI alone.
Methods
We performed a retrospective chart review of new patient visits to an academic Urogynecology clinic from 2007–2011. Clinical records were reviewed; demographic data and responses to the ISI and Wexner scales were recorded. Patients’ written responses to the ISI and Wexner were compared to the diagnoses obtained from oral history by the physician.
Results
Of 1899 women in the database, 557 women were diagnosed with dual incontinence (DI) and 447 women were diagnosed with UI alone. Women with DI were less likely to orally disclose FI than UI (135/557 (23%), vs 485/557(87%), p<0.001) but were as likely as women with UI alone to disclose UI (385/447(86%) vs 485/557(87%), p=0.66). In the multivariable analysis, DI subjects had greater odds of disclosing FI to their physicians if they had private insurance (OR 1.9, 95%CI [1.2, 3.0]) or Wexner score > 7 (OR 9.0, 95% CI [5.4,14.8]) and lower ISI score (OR 1.5, CI [1.4, 1.6]).
Conclusions
Women with DI were less likely to report FI in comparison to UI. Patients were more likely to orally report FI when the symptoms were severe.