Factors associated with the effective inclusion of primary‐aged pupils with Down's syndrome

Abstract

It is increasingly common for pupils with Down's syndrome to be offered places in mainstream primary schools. However, there is still much to learn about the impact of these placements upon children and classrooms. Recently the Nuffield Foundation funded a two‐year research project exploring the inclusion of primary‐aged pupils with Down's syndrome. The research focused on the inclusion of 18 pupils with Down's syndrome who attended mainstream primary schools in six local education authorities (LEAs) in the north‐west of England. The research team investigated the ways in which schools manage the inclusion of pupils with Down's syndrome and the factors that contribute to the success of mainstream placements. In this article, Sam Fox, Peter Farrell and Pauline Davis from the University of Manchester discuss some of the findings from the study. These concern the support in place for the child and the attitudes of staff, other pupils and the parents of peers towards the inclusion of the child with Down's syndrome. Evidence from the 18 case studies suggests that there is no single way to guarantee effective inclusion. The extent to which a child is effectively included in a mainstream class is likely to be influenced by a number of key factors, including the way in which the teaching assistant (TA) works with the class teacher. Inclusion is more likely to be successful when the class teacher takes a central role in the management of support and the organisation of a child's daily educational experiences.

Inclusive education reform in Queensland: implications for policy and practice

“…Fundamental attitudinal change involves examining personal belief systems about teaching and learning, but more importantly beliefs about difference and disability and how these beliefs inform teaching and learning (Carrington, 2000). This type of reflective process can only take place through a collaborative process of team building through which all members of the students' support network meet regularly to reflect on underlying assumptions and inclusive practices which ensue from these assumptions (Ainscow et al, 2004;Cremin, Thomas, & Vincett, 2005;Fox, Farrell, & Davis, 2004;Hauge & Babkie, 2006;Hunt et al, 2003;Kugelmass, 2004;van Kraayenoord, 2003).…”

The efficiency of integrated and segregated physical education classes for secondary school students with physical and mental disabilities and poor fitness

“…The majority of scientific studies proved the efficiency of integrated education for schoolchildren with high morbidity level [14][15][16][17][18]. The influence of integrated education upon the students with minor health problems still needs further investigation.…”

Educating a Syndrome?: Seeking a Balance Between Identifying a Learning Profile and Delivering Inclusive Education

“…He was not viewed by the other children in the same way as he had been the previous year since they were no longer used to interacting with him in class and did not include him so readily in their play." (pg 187, Fox, et al, 2004) The negative response of peers is a key concern. Learning is a social activity and to be effective we need to feel that we are valued participants in the learning process (Rogoff, 1990).…”