Factors Associated with the Efficacy of XEN Gel Implant

Abstract

Introduction Microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a growing trend, and XEN gel implant is one of the most effective types of MIGS. This study aimed to examine factors associated with the surgical success of XEN gel implants. Methods This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with glaucoma receiving XEN implantation alone or combined with phacoemulsification (PHACOXEN) with a follow-up period of more than 6 months at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Taiwan. If intraocular pressure (IOP) elevated above 20 mmHg during the follow-up, needling or open revision was performed. The primary outcome measures included IOP and the number of glaucoma medications. Results Male patients had lower postoperative IOP; male patients and higher preoperative IOP were associated with higher IOP change rates, and older patients had a higher chance of achieving IOP < 18 mmHg and being medication-free at months 12, 24, and 36. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed that the probability of free-of-rescue intervention over the follow-up period was not different between the XEN alone and the PHACOXEN group ( P = 0.859). Both needling and open revision were effective rescue interventions, but open revision had a higher chance of achieving IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and being medication-free ( P = 0.031) and required less medication afterward ( P = 0.044). Older age ( P = 0.013) and male patients ( P = 0.022) had a lower IOP after rescue interventions. Compared with open revision, needling was associated with higher IOP ( P = 0.048) and more required medications ( P = 0.048). Conclusions XEN alone and PHACOXEN had comparable surgical outcomes, whereas open revision had a better IOP lowering effect than needling as a rescue intervention. Male and older patients had better surgical results in primary XEN implantations and rescue interventions.