Factors associated with the efficacy of a group intervention for anger in people with intellectual disabilities

Rose, John; Loftus, Michael J.; Flint, Beverley; Carey, Louise

doi:10.1348/014466505x29972

Cited by 94 publications

(94 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies reported the particular benefits of using computers in therapy with people with ID in terms of increasing their willingness to engage in individual therapy because interactive techniques promote a sense of ownership and motivation to change (Rose, West, & Clifford, 2000). People without ID indicated that the benefits and value of computerised therapy programmes were in increasing their insight into their mental health problems, improving their knowledge and understanding of CBT, teaching them therapy skills and techniques (Bendelin et al, 2011;Gega, Smith, & Reynolds, 2013) and helping them feel empowered (Knowles et al, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This comment is important because it pre-empts an important limitation of computerised therapy: the generic standardised materials that do not address the person's specific needs and circumstances (Gega et al, 2013;Hind et al, 2010) A clinician touched upon the possibility of involving a third party, such as carers or teachers, when using computers in therapy. This is important not only because carers enable people with ID to access therapy services, but also because carers can help the communication between the therapist and the person with ID (Department of Health, 2009;Hurley et al, 1998;Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004) and enhance therapy effects (Rose, Loftus, Flint, & Carey, 2005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intellectual disability and computers in therapy: Views of service users and clinical psychologists

Vereenooghe¹,

Gega²,

Langdon³

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectual disability and computers in therapy: Views of service users and clinical psychologists

Vereenooghe¹,

Gega²,

Langdon³

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This semi-independence should be aken into account when interpreting results from the meta-analysis. Similarly, the study arms of Rose, Loftus, Flint and Carey (2005) are not fully independent because data from participants on the waiting-list who continued to receive treatment were included in their analysis.…”

Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological therapies for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Vereenooghe

Langdon

2013

Research in Developmental Disabilities

215

174

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of psychological therapies for people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) through a systematic review and metaanalysis of the current literature. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search identified 143 intervention studies. Twenty-two trials were eligible for review, and 14 of these were subsequently included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Many studies did not include adequate information about their participants, especially the nature of their IDs; information about masked assessment, and therapy fidelity was also lacking. The meta-analysis yielded an overall moderate between-group effect size, g = .682, while group-based interventions had a moderate but smaller treatment effect than individual-based interventions. Cognitivebehaviour therapy (CBT) was efficacious for both anger and depression, while interventions aimed at improving interpersonal functioning were not effectual. When CBT was excluded, there was insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of other psychological therapies, or psychological therapies intended to treat mental health problems in children and young people with IDs. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with IDs and concurrent mental health problems appear to benefit from psychological therapies. However, clinical trials need to make use of improved reporting standards and larger samples.

show abstract

“…Positive results were reported for two interventionscognitive reappraisal and problem-solving -but few further details are available. participants 39,41,42 (although this has been disputed), 49 and in participants who are accompanied to the group by a carer. 39,41 There is evidence that 'paraprofessionals', working under supervision following minimal training, can deliver effective manualised CBT.…”

Section: Anger In People With Intellectual Disabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

Willner

Rose²,

Jahoda³

et al. 2013

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Willner P, Rose J, Jahoda A, Stenfert Kroese B, Felce D, MacMahon P, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive-behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities. Health Technol Assess 2013;17(21). This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/). Health Technology Assessment is indexed and abstracted inEditorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions.For more information about the HTA programme please visit the website: www.hta.ac.uk/ This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 08/53/34. The contractual start date was in May 2009. The draft report began editorial review in May 2012 and was accepted for publication in August 2012. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ...

show abstract

Factors associated with the efficacy of a group intervention for anger in people with intellectual disabilities

Cited by 94 publications

References 35 publications

Intellectual disability and computers in therapy: Views of service users and clinical psychologists

Intellectual disability and computers in therapy: Views of service users and clinical psychologists

Psychological therapies for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About