Factors associated with trauma clinic follow-up compliance after discharge

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Disparities in access to postdischarge services for trauma patients exist, and clinic follow-up remains an important avenue to ensure initial and continued access to postdischarge services. In addition, follow-up is vital to rigorous long-term trauma outcomes research. However, there is a relative paucity of literature specifically addressing clinic follow-up. The purposes of this study were to elucidate factors associated with clinic follow-up compliance and noncompliance after discharge from an urban Level I trauma center and to confirm the prevailing notion that follow-up in trauma clinic is poor. METHODS:Our trauma registry was queried for all trauma service discharges of patients 18 years and older for a 2-year period. Patients with incomplete information were excluded. Demographic data such as race/ethnicity and insurance status were collected on all patients. Primary outcome was defined as trauma clinic follow-up within 4 weeks after discharge. Patients compliant with follow-up were compared with noncompliant patients. RESULTS:After exclusion criteria were applied, there were 1,818 discharges included in the analysis, with 564 (31%) complying with follow-up (p G 0.001). Factors significantly associated with follow-up noncompliance included patients older than 35 years, white race, Medicaid/Medicare payers, blunt mechanism, extended hospital length of stay, and discharge to rehabilitation facilities. No insurance, penetrating mechanism, short hospital stay, discharge to home, and weekend discharge were all significantly associated with follow-up compliance. Discharge on weekends and to home were independent predictors of compliance, whereas, Medicaid/Medicare insurance status and operative intervention were independent predictors of noncompliance. CONCLUSION:This study indentifies factors associated with trauma clinic follow-up compliance and confirms the notion that trauma clinic follow-up compliance at an urban Level I trauma center is alarmingly low. These findings may serve as targets to improve follow-up, thereby improving trauma outcomes research and long-term outcomes. Consequently, clinic follow-up compliance warrants further study and consideration as an essential trauma registry datum. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76: 185Y190.

Intentional fallers with complex pelvic and acetabular fractures do not have worse radiological and functional outcomes than accidental fallers

“…Several factors were associated with functional outcomes following orthopedic surgeries, such as the characteristic of fractures, quality of reduction and fixation, complications, rehabilitation protocol, patients' compliance, and so on [23][24][25][26][27][28]. During the study period, the principles, implants, surgical techniques, and physical therapies for treating pelvic and acetabular fractures were similar in all patients.…”

National Analysis of Risk Factors for Nasal Fractures and Associated Injuries in Trauma

“…1 However, previous studies of trauma patients have demonstrated poor rates of outpatient follow-up. 37,38 Stewart and Chen found that 66% of patients with isolated facial trauma attended their first follow-up appointment, but only 46% kept their recommended follow-up care. 39 Thus, given the low rate of follow-up, future multicenter studies on facial fractures that include follow-up data are needed to further evaluate whether our findings are representative of actual national rates of interventions in trauma subjects.…”

Immobilization following Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

“…Similar low rates of compliance with postoperative follow-up visits have been previously reported at the same medical center. 21 This was an unfunded study; therefore, patients were not compensated for returning to clinic. It is possible that patients returning after 2 weeks may have created a negative bias; patients who expected shorter time to return to normal function were more likely to return.…”