2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00705-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors controlling soil carbon and nitrogen stores in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This was due to different land use (vegetation) species having different N requirements, exploiting N with varying efficiency and storing or converting N at different rates (Aert and Chapin, 2000;Chen and Li, 2003). The distribution of soil N has a close relationship with root distribution (Berger et al, 2002). Many studies have …”
Section: Change Of Soil Nutrients Under Different Land Use Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to different land use (vegetation) species having different N requirements, exploiting N with varying efficiency and storing or converting N at different rates (Aert and Chapin, 2000;Chen and Li, 2003). The distribution of soil N has a close relationship with root distribution (Berger et al, 2002). Many studies have …”
Section: Change Of Soil Nutrients Under Different Land Use Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though a lot of work has been done to study the positive effects of biodiversity on ecological function (Balvanera et al, 2006;Marquard et al, 2009), attention is rarely given to soil organic carbon (Vesterdal et al, 2013) and nitrogen stocks, which are closely related to global climate change. The limited research shows that the soil OC and N stocks in mixed stands do not necessarily exceed those of corresponding pure stands (Berger et al, 2002;Forrester et al, 2012;Wiesmeier et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Cremer et al, 2016). Most previous studies did not consider the relative portion of the component species (Berger et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2013;Cremer et al, 2016), which may result in an underestimation of admixing effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited research shows that the soil OC and N stocks in mixed stands do not necessarily exceed those of corresponding pure stands (Berger et al, 2002;Forrester et al, 2012;Wiesmeier et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Cremer et al, 2016). Most previous studies did not consider the relative portion of the component species (Berger et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2013;Cremer et al, 2016), which may result in an underestimation of admixing effects. For example, admixing effects could also exist because of the small portion of higher-production species, which leads to low expected production even if the production of a twospecies mixed stand is between that of two corresponding pure stands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the regression between log organic carbon and δ 13 C, we found that SOC turnover was slower in the mature forest than in the disturbed and rehabilitated forests (Table 3), which was partially attributed to thicker soil and higher silt and clay content (Table 1). Plant roots were prone to extend downwards to absorb nutrients in the deeper soil layers, which can increase root biomass and decrease the decomposition of root residues (Jobbágy and Jackson 2000;Berger et al 2002). Soil clay and silt had strong ability to conserve soil organic matter, thus SOC associated with fine soil particles was difficult to be decomposed by soil microorganism (Garten et al 1999;Carter et al 2003).…”
Section: Microbial Biomass C and Water Soluble Organic C In Surface Smentioning
confidence: 99%