2010
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.570648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Explaining Excess Stroke Prevalence: The Spanish Stroke Belt

Abstract: Factors Explaining Excess Stroke Prevalence:The Spanish Stroke Belt To the Editor:We have read with interest the article of Liao et al on factors explaining excess stroke prevalence in the US stroke belt. 1 Identifying the factors contributing to stroke disparities is clearly an important question, as long as the precise reason for this has been a topic of debate and controversy for decades. Moreover, we consider that when these results are also congruent with the data published in other countries, the key rol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, suppression of contralesional M1 may be contraindicated in more severely affected stroke patients (Bradnam et al, 2012). Third, the proposed CRPP model supports the emerging view that NBS neuromodulation should be tailored individually for patients after stroke based on impairment level (at the chronic stage) (Cramer, 2010; Stinear, 2010; Bradnam et al, 2012) and perhaps, based on the residual capacity of their descending motor pathways (at the sub-acute stage). Further research examining the full range of neurophysiological effects induced by NBS seems warranted.…”
Section: Implications For Non-invasive Brain Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Second, suppression of contralesional M1 may be contraindicated in more severely affected stroke patients (Bradnam et al, 2012). Third, the proposed CRPP model supports the emerging view that NBS neuromodulation should be tailored individually for patients after stroke based on impairment level (at the chronic stage) (Cramer, 2010; Stinear, 2010; Bradnam et al, 2012) and perhaps, based on the residual capacity of their descending motor pathways (at the sub-acute stage). Further research examining the full range of neurophysiological effects induced by NBS seems warranted.…”
Section: Implications For Non-invasive Brain Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…1 Regional differences are documented across different parts of the world, for example in the “stroke belts” in USA, Spain, and China. 24 In China, there is a higher incidence of stroke in the northern areas. Regional differences have been noted in Thailand with higher stroke prevalence rates in cities and central regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic data and comorbidities were similar in both groups. Among the included patients, the median NIHSS score at baseline was 17 [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] and the most frequently affected territory was the anterior circulation (87.3%). Cardioembolic etiology, found in 51% of the samples, was the most prevalent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, the burden of vascular risk factors, cerebrovascular disease mortality, and stroke management protocols differ among the different areas. In Spain, situated in the south of Europe, there is a specific southern region of the country (regions of Andalusia and Murcia) where higher rates of cardiovascular factors and stroke mortality have been reported, called the “Stroke Belt” [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Similarly, Andalusia is a region with a large degree of geographical dispersion, where a high percentage of patients are initially referred to a hospital without a neurologist and, if needed, subsequently transferred to a stroke center (SC), according to a drip-and-ship model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%