2020
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10040099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Governing Total and Permanganate Oxidizable C Pools in Agricultural Soils from Southern Italy

Abstract: The present investigation was aimed to quantify the three principal components of the soil carbon (C) stock, namely inorganic, organic and permanganate oxidizable, in 0–5 cm and 5–30 cm soil layers, of the main Mediterranean agricultural land coverages: olive grove, olive forest, citrus grove, vineyard, arable irrigated, arable rainfed and natural soil covered by Mediterranean scrub and garrigue. We assessed the contribution of soil properties and climatic variables on soil TOC and POxC by Pearson’s correlatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
(107 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil POxC, contrary to what was expected, does not show effects due to the tillage systems, while significant differences were retrieved among soils, with values in line with those previously retrieved by Badagliacca et al [65] in a survey that covered these same agroecosystems. With this regard, higher values of labile C were observed in GAL, a soil with a higher concentration of organic C, than in SMA characterized by meaningfully lower values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Soil POxC, contrary to what was expected, does not show effects due to the tillage systems, while significant differences were retrieved among soils, with values in line with those previously retrieved by Badagliacca et al [65] in a survey that covered these same agroecosystems. With this regard, higher values of labile C were observed in GAL, a soil with a higher concentration of organic C, than in SMA characterized by meaningfully lower values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%