2019
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2019-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors impacting logging costs: A case study in the Northeast, US

Abstract: Understanding business costs is critical to the economic viability of logging businesses. Various harvest and logger characteristics impact logging costs. This study sought to examine factors influencing logging costs of ground-based harvesting systems across 23 logging jobs. On-site interviews were conducted with loggers across New York and Northern Pennsylvania. Machine rates and throughput accounting were used to calculate logging costs. Regression analysis identified significant variables influencing per u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, trees with high diameters were discovered to have more volume and vice versa, and those with small diameters were also found to have needed shorter logging time. Germain et. al.…”
Section: Logging Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, trees with high diameters were discovered to have more volume and vice versa, and those with small diameters were also found to have needed shorter logging time. Germain et. al.…”
Section: Logging Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the majority of respondents (69%) completed high school Forests 2023, 14, 1695 6 of 14 but did not complete a college degree. Other studies have noted the lack of formal education in the logging industry, with most knowledge originating from on-site experience [36]. The obtained level of education could explain the lack of use of more advanced technology from respondents, with only 36% using computer mapping, 42% using GPS technology, 12% not using email, and 23% not using the Internet as part of their business (Figure 4).…”
Section: Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The second hypothesis is that AT is also able to reduce GHG emissions in comparison to TT. By increasing the retrieved timber amount and being localized in a less scattered way, a decrease in the time needed is indeed expected, mostly for bunching and extraction operations, considering that the extracted timber amount and bunching/extraction distance are among the most important influencing factors for work productivity and related harvesting costs [27,30,31]. As well as increased work productivity, for the same machinery, it can lead to reduced pollutant emissions, as a consequence of the lower time needed for the operations [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%